Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Television Broadcast Gear

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2011, 04:45 AM
Aussie Bloke's Avatar
Aussie Bloke Aussie Bloke is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 560
Requesting deflection yoke design data for 5820 3" IO tube

G'day all.

I was wondering if anyone here has any design schematics and data for a 5820 3" image orthicon TV camera tube? I am requesting this information for my future project mentioned a while back which was to build a solid state 3 inch IO camera and whilst tubes often pop up on Ebay, yokes pretty much never show up so I will have to build one myself. Anyways if anyone has any info on 3" IO yoke designs and can supply me with scans it would be much appreciated and I will happily return the favour in some way. I am also after any other yoke designs for all other camera tube types as well too.
__________________
AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE!!!!! OI OI OI!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-22-2011, 02:04 PM
BrianSummers's Avatar
BrianSummers BrianSummers is offline
TV Camera Museum Curator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey in the UK
Posts: 112
I may have mentioned this before, but you could try trawling through the BATC archives, try issues Number 89, 1979 http://www.batc.org.uk/cq-tv/archive/1975.html

There is a lot of stuff going back 60 years.

Brian S
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-22-2011, 04:14 PM
Aussie Bloke's Avatar
Aussie Bloke Aussie Bloke is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 560
Thanks Brian. I am actually already aware of that CQ-TV issue and the 4.5" IO camera design given and have seen the yoke design and have downloaded that issue and the other issues relating to that IO camera. I will check the other issues too to see if anything pops up.
__________________
AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE!!!!! OI OI OI!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2011, 04:36 PM
NewVista's Avatar
NewVista NewVista is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Milw, WI
Posts: 724
Why wouldn't IO's have employed low power electrostatic deflection instead of bulky heavy inefficient electromagnetic deflection?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2011, 10:29 PM
old_tv_nut's Avatar
old_tv_nut old_tv_nut is offline
See yourself on Color TV!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rancho Sahuarita
Posts: 7,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewVista View Post
Why wouldn't IO's have employed low power electrostatic deflection instead of bulky heavy inefficient electromagnetic deflection?
I suspect electrostatic deflection would have interfered with the return beam and electron multiplier.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.