Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Rectangular Screen Tube Televisions

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-18-2010, 10:55 PM
AUdubon5425's Avatar
AUdubon5425 AUdubon5425 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Picayune, Miss.
Posts: 1,769
'66 Zenith Transistor Protable TV alert

no affiliation; I know Doug documented one of these recently:

Zenith transistor TV
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2010, 10:19 AM
kx250rider's Avatar
kx250rider kx250rider is offline
REAL TVs have TUBES!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles & Dallas
Posts: 3,239
I saw that, and I do want one! But with so many projects sitting and waiting, I'm going to pass and wait for a clean and complete one. I know they're rare, so some day I might regret passing this one up. It also irks me that the seller so boldly states "first portable TV", when we all know the 1960-61 Philco Safari was the first battery-operated portable TV in the USA, unless that's changed.

Charles
__________________
Collecting & restoring TVs in Los Angeles since age 10
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2010, 01:30 PM
jr_tech's Avatar
jr_tech jr_tech is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,573
I think the sequence For transistor portable TVs is as follows:

1. Philco "Safari" ----1959
2. Motorola "Astronaut" 19" ----1960
3. Sony 8-301W 8" -----1961

jr
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN0689.jpg (46.9 KB, 55 views)

Last edited by jr_tech; 02-19-2010 at 01:43 PM. Reason: add pix
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-19-2010, 03:13 PM
AUdubon5425's Avatar
AUdubon5425 AUdubon5425 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Picayune, Miss.
Posts: 1,769
And I apologize for calling the Zenith a "protable"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2010, 04:47 PM
andy andy is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,004
000

Last edited by andy; 12-07-2021 at 04:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 02-19-2010, 05:03 PM
jr_tech's Avatar
jr_tech jr_tech is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy View Post
I always thought the Sony was from late 59/early 60.
Possibly... The reference I use is "The Sony Vision", 1975, By Nick Lyons. On page 111 he states as a caption for a photograph ". The world's first all transistor television, TV-8-301, marketed in Japan in May 1960 and in America in June 1961". Well, we *know* it was not the worlds first transistor TV, so perhaps the stated dates are in question, as well.

I believe that all 3 of these sets use vacuum tube Hv. rectifiers (as well as the CRT), so are not really "all transistor".

jr

Last edited by jr_tech; 02-19-2010 at 05:24 PM. Reason: add info
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-19-2010, 06:10 PM
andy andy is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,004
000

Last edited by andy; 12-07-2021 at 04:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-20-2010, 10:08 AM
drh4683's Avatar
drh4683 drh4683 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,094
Thats the 3rd one I've seen with a missing/broken on off volume knob. That must have been the weak point on these sets. Nice to see the one on ebay also has the battery pack with it still. Zenith was always late in the game introducing the new technologies (with exception of the royal 500 transistor radio), but when they did come out, nobody could compete with the quality and reliability. That was a company that was engineering driven, which is why I like them so much. They took the time to perfect their designs before they were introduced.
__________________
I tolerate the present by living in the past...
To see drh4683's photo page, click here
To see drh4683's youtube page, click here

Last edited by drh4683; 02-20-2010 at 10:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-20-2010, 10:57 AM
kx250rider's Avatar
kx250rider kx250rider is offline
REAL TVs have TUBES!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles & Dallas
Posts: 3,239
All the data, Sams, and ads I have seen on the Safari say '61, but I know there's a debate on that. The Sony is the same thing. Some sources say '59, and I've seen some credible sources having written '63.

Charles
__________________
Collecting & restoring TVs in Los Angeles since age 10
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-20-2010, 12:12 PM
jr_tech's Avatar
jr_tech jr_tech is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by kx250rider View Post
All the data, Sams, and ads I have seen on the Safari say '61, but I know there's a debate on that. The Sony is the same thing. Some sources say '59, and I've seen some credible sources having written '63.

Charles
My Sams for the Safari is set 475 folder #2 dated 2-60, since the Sams usually lags the production by a few months, I took this as pretty good evidence that production of the set began in 1959.

There was also a Nov 1959 issue of "Electronics Illustrated " that pictured the set, and indicated that it was available, but sometimes introduction schedules "slip".

jr

Last edited by jr_tech; 02-20-2010 at 12:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #11  
Old 02-21-2010, 10:39 AM
kx250rider's Avatar
kx250rider kx250rider is offline
REAL TVs have TUBES!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles & Dallas
Posts: 3,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by jr_tech View Post
My Sams for the Safari is set 475 folder #2 dated 2-60, since the Sams usually lags the production by a few months, I took this as pretty good evidence that production of the set began in 1959.

There was also a Nov 1959 issue of "Electronics Illustrated " that pictured the set, and indicated that it was available, but sometimes introduction schedules "slip".

jr
Didn't Philco use the last digit of the year of production as the first digit of their TV chassis numbers? (early Predicta 1959 was 9L37, then 10L43 for '60, and 11L43 for '61, etc)... Not sure about that, but if so, the chassis number on the Safari might show what year model they intended it to be. Or if the model number H-2010 contains the same code, I guess that would be '60, which lends a lot to what you read.

Charles
__________________
Collecting & restoring TVs in Los Angeles since age 10
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-21-2010, 12:00 PM
jr_tech's Avatar
jr_tech jr_tech is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,573
That makes a lot of sense! So perhaps the chassis number 10AT10 for the Safari indicates a 1960 model. Since Philco released the new models somewhat in advance*, a November 1959 release would seem reasonable. Might have been a pretty good Christmas item.

*I just checked a Philco that I know was purchased in Nov. 1952 and the model is 53U-1827.

jr
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-21-2010, 05:54 PM
wa2ise's Avatar
wa2ise wa2ise is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,147
There were "portable" TVs that were portable only because there was a handle attached to it. You still needed a powerline to operate it. There was that early TV set that looked a lot like an oscilloscope (and I wouldn't be surprised that it was an oscilloscope with a B&W CRT and tuner-IF-sound-speaker strip added. Some portables were really "luggables"...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-21-2010, 08:42 PM
Robert Grant's Avatar
Robert Grant Robert Grant is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Monroe County, MI
Posts: 518
This probably does not count, since it was not a production model set, but a TV set pictured on p. 93 of the July, 1954 National Geographic is interesting.

The caption:
"Tomorrow's Picknickers May Pack a Television Set with the Lunch
In this hatbox-size set, tiny transistors eliminate all vacuum tubes except the picture tube itself. With "rabbit ears" antenna the 5-inch screen can capture a picture telecast 15 miles away. The experimental battery set, under test by RCA, weighs 27 pounds."
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-21-2010, 09:37 PM
jr_tech's Avatar
jr_tech jr_tech is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,573
I found an earlier article on the Safari in Popular Science:

http://books.google.com/books?id=cyY...safari&f=false

jr
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.