![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
chnl 10 problem
Quote:
But since I'll be getting a converter box it won't matter. Also, I plan to use this set for DVD/VCR use since the picture quality is very good. So "NAP" stands for "North American Philips", right??? Regards, Ron
__________________
JBL pro for home use |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you have lost channel ten, the other channels are normal, and your set has a digital electronic tuner, cleaning won't help as there is nothing to clean in these modern tuners. I once had a Zenith 13" color portable with a single-knob 12-position VHF/UHF varactor electronic tuner; these can conceivably go bad if the switch mechanism that turns the channel indicator and switches the parameters of the tuner (for want of a better phrase) gets dirty or corroded, but I can't see how an all-electronic tuner can lose only one channel. Hmmm.
__________________
Jeff, WB8NHV Collecting, restoring and enjoying vintage Zenith radios since 2002 Zenith. Gone, but not forgotten. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well in an electronic tuner, sometimes it can be beneficial to take apart the tuning box/IF box and clean the contacts with alcohol. If there are modular pin connectors, clean the posts there as well. Worth a shot, but it's true that channel 3 is all we'll need after the transition to DTV.
I prefer analog potentiometers and switches to on-screen menus as well. Like Jeff noted, if the controller chip goes bad, it may not be worth the time and money to fix the set. Whereas, in an older TV, the controls usually just need some DeOxit cleaner and/or their board's solder joints reflowed. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That loss of channel 10 could be due to loose connections in the tuner and where the tuner plugs into the chassis. I don't know when NAP actually bought Magnavox. I've heard '74, '78, and '80. I do know that they bought Magnavox before they bought the consumer electronics division of GTE (Sylvania/Philco). Sometime in '81, NAP bought the consumer electronics division from GTE, which included the Sylvania and Philco names. GTE had already purchased Philco from Ford around '75. I have a 19" Philco-GTE set that was made in April, '81. I think it was one of the very last pre-NAP Philco's. NAP sets were, for the most part, decent quality up until the late '90's. Then, the quality really went downhill. As with other old brand names, Magnavox is now pretty much just a name slapped on Funai trash. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh, and I'm another one that likes the old pot controls. When dealing with on screen adjustments, I often have to think "do I move from one adjustment with the volume or channel buttons". It seems like all sets have a slightly different way of getting around in the menu. Also, many sets do not have a menu button on the set and a remote must be used. Many times, a universal remote will not do the job. An original remote must be used and those are often expensive or NLA.
|
| Audiokarma |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
The chassis in this TV doesn't look like it has anything to do with Philips, the layout is very different, of course a NTSC chassis has to be different from the European PAL ones i'm used to, but 80s Philips designs are always very distinctive anyway.
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
I of course can be mistaken Kiwick. Not sure now.
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like the knobs and switches as I can do more than one at once and don't have to wait for the on-screen image to go away before I can adjust the next one.
BTW - It might have something to do with the fact that I'm past the half century mark and like the way things were done in the old days. Regards, Ron
__________________
JBL pro for home use |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Ron- I'm only 20 and I prefer the old fashioned way too.
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Today's sets with the jungle IC can develop more than just OSD display problems if that chip goes bad, as most of the set's control circuits are on the chip; it all depends on what part of the IC goes. My RCA CTC185 XL-100, for example, developed a problem with its jungle IC after I'd had the set about a year; the technician who repaired the set (for an unrelated problem) told me it would cost at least $100 to replace and reprogram the chip. The warranty had expired by this time, so I decided against the latter and am now using the TV as it is. The set works very well, is in daily use with OTA signals, a VCR and a DVD player, and makes a beautiful picture, so I really don't know to this day (eight years later) what the tech meant when he said part of the jungle IC was defective. Perhaps I'd notice the problem if I were using the set on an antenna, but since I have cable it doesn't show--probably because the cable signal is much stronger than any antenna signal would be in my area. BTW, I agree with the person who said in a previous post that universal TV remotes often do not control every conceivable function of today's sets, making it almost imperative that the original remote be used if the more exotic functions are desired. Again using my RCA CTC185 as an example, the commercial-skip function only works with the set's original remote; every universal remote I've used with this set (including a GE universal I bought for $5 at Big Lots a couple years ago, and still use today, so I could use one remote for my TV, VCR and DVD) has operated all functions except the commercial skip. IMHO, it depends on personal preferences. If all one wants is control of basic functions of a TV and/or VCR/DVD, most universals will work just fine. However, for full control of every function available on any of these devices, in most cases the original remote(s) must be used. If the original(s) is/are lost, damaged or quit(s) for any reason, and a universal remote doesn't operate some special functions of your devices, you're out of luck as far as those functions are concerned. Since, as has been noted, many original TV remotes are difficult to find, are NLA (no longer available), or have been lost or broken, as is often the case with some TVs offered for auction on eBay, universal remotes are being used in place of the originals, but the tradeoff is, again, loss of some functions offered by the remote that came with the set. However, many people are just happy to have a remote again (after the original breaks or quits for whatever reason) and could not care less about the lesser-used functions such as commercial skip and the like, so they won't mind that these extra functions may not work with a universal controller. I know at least one person who doesn't use her TV remote for anything but turning the set on/off, adjusting volume and changing channels; she just ignores the rest of the buttons, including mute. A universal remote would suit this person just fine, and would accomodate her VCR and DVD as well.
__________________
Jeff, WB8NHV Collecting, restoring and enjoying vintage Zenith radios since 2002 Zenith. Gone, but not forgotten. |
| Audiokarma |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm curious if Philips ever did use a "worldwide" chassis in the US? I recall his being brought up before. NAP was a very high volume manufacturer at one time and so could have very well designed those for here only.
'75 seems to be the most mentioned year for the sale of Magnavox. I have read that the logo change that took place in the 70s had to do with this sale-the older one was "Magnavox" and the newer one "MAGNAVOX" in capitals. I have also read that the old Magnavox company remained as a maker of commercial or industrial equipment and kept the old logo for their use. I know I've seen some "old logo" sets up into the '76-77 era. Apparently when NAP bought that business it moved production from the old Ft. Wayne facilities down to the all new plant in Greeneville, TN. I know the Sylvania plant was in Batavia, NY but I've never seen an indication of where picture tubes were made after the sale. There are a couple people on AK who would know as they worked at (or with) the company at that time. I enjoy reading the history, and like to see that we have the facts straight. There were at least 2 things that NAP really wanted, that it obtained from buying GTE's consumer electronics division. It got the crt production, and it got the Philco name. As mentioned elsewhere, there was a longstanding agreement that the Philips name could not be used in the USA as it was too similiar to Philco. Once NAP owned the name they could do anything they wanted. NAP never owned the Sylvania name, though...they only licensed it from GTE (which continued using it on lighting and such until it sold that division to Osram). The Sylvania name as used nowadays on consumer electronics is licensed from Osram to Funai or somebody.
__________________
Bryan |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
The only 80s Philips "world" chassis with NTSC capability i'm aware of is the CTO-N, it was built in the 1983-1985 time frame.
Here's a Philips CTO-N set, model 16CT6425/51S: http://www.marcelstvmuseum.com/photoalbum83.html as you can see here: http://www.marcelstvmuseum.com/phili...nenkant01.html, the typical Philips chassis layout and passive components (philips always used their own capacitors back then) are totally different from the Magnavox chassis Take a closer look at the CRT socket board, ALL philips boards carry a Philips "XXXX XXX XXXX X" part code somewhere, You can also see the way the PCB tracks are designed, this is another unique Philips feature Last edited by Kiwick; 05-01-2009 at 03:56 AM. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for that information, bgadow. Very good stuff...I like to hear these stories as well.
Now that I think of it, I am most likely wrong about the chassis being a Philips. I just thought it was their design since they did own Magnavox in '84. The capacitors are NOT branded Philips, they're Nichicons. However, the small horizontal transformer is a Philips and at least one other part I saw also was. From your pics, Kiwick, the traces on the neckboard do look similar but the chassis layout does not. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't have a problem with digital chnl tuning, I'm talking about adjusting the picture quality. I still prefer knobs for that purpose.
52 in July! Ron
__________________
JBL pro for home use |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quick question about the proper setting of the CRT cutoff and Drive controls:
As found, the controls were all down all the way, and the master G2 control was up higher than I'd like. What I did was increase the blue cutoff a tad since the greyscale was brownish in low-light conditions. I left the RGB drives alone. I also turned the G2 back a little since the brightness pot had plenty of extra gain which wasn't needed. Now, when there is an exceptionally contrasty raster (like certain commercials) the color gets kind of washed out (yellow, in particular looks kind of lifeless) I'm going to open the set again and re-do everything. FWIW, I let the set warm up for 30 minutes before adjustments. Basically, I've set up many tv's before and haven't encountered this phenomenon. Any tips on getting the best possible color picture from this TV? Thanks in advance. |
| Audiokarma |
![]() |
|
|