Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Rectangular Screen Tube Televisions

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 04-30-2009, 02:05 PM
spkrman57's Avatar
spkrman57 spkrman57 is offline
wrongsideofthetracks
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Columbus. Ohio
Posts: 30
chnl 10 problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by zenith2134 View Post
Cool! Save it! Sounds like a quality TV set. As for the channel 10 issue, it could simply need the tuner cleaned out. What does the picture look like on channel 10? Snow? or black screen?

North American Philips bought up the Magnavox, Sylvania, and Philco names from General Telephone and Electronics (GTE) who already owned Sylvania and built them at Batavia NY and other locations in the USA. This was in the early 80s and apparently built these sets in Tennessee at the original Magnavox factory. The chassis were designed by Philips and the CRT's are Sylvanias as far as I can tell.
Chnl 10 comes in like every other "no-signal" chnl, snowy that is.

But since I'll be getting a converter box it won't matter. Also, I plan to use this set for DVD/VCR use since the picture quality is very good.

So "NAP" stands for "North American Philips", right???


Regards, Ron
__________________
JBL pro for home use
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-30-2009, 02:39 PM
Jeffhs's Avatar
Jeffhs Jeffhs is offline
<----Zenith C845
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fairport Harbor, Ohio (near Lake Erie)
Posts: 4,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by spkrman57 View Post
I just got my converter coupons yesterday and will get a converter to keep using this nice running TV. Plus I love the fact that there is a flip down drawer for all the adjustments, none of that on-screen modern garbage they sell now days.
I'm curious. What is it you don't like about on-screen menus and controls, which are all but universal in today's TVs? I think they are an improvement over mechanical tuners, potentiometers, and switches, as on-screen controls don't wear out and are easier to adjust (they have a cursor that moves along a scale, which is good for finding the midpoint of the control's travel). The only real drawback I can see to this system is that if a certain section of the jungle IC (that large IC in today's TVs with 30 pins or more) goes bad, it can disable those OSD controls and menus--even if the TV still makes a picture.

If you have lost channel ten, the other channels are normal, and your set has a digital electronic tuner, cleaning won't help as there is nothing to clean in these modern tuners. I once had a Zenith 13" color portable with a single-knob 12-position VHF/UHF varactor electronic tuner; these can conceivably go bad if the switch mechanism that turns the channel indicator and switches the parameters of the tuner (for want of a better phrase) gets dirty or corroded, but I can't see how an all-electronic tuner can lose only one channel. Hmmm.
__________________
Jeff, WB8NHV

Collecting, restoring and enjoying vintage Zenith radios since 2002

Zenith. Gone, but not forgotten.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-30-2009, 02:51 PM
zenith2134's Avatar
zenith2134 zenith2134 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UTC -4
Posts: 2,546
Well in an electronic tuner, sometimes it can be beneficial to take apart the tuning box/IF box and clean the contacts with alcohol. If there are modular pin connectors, clean the posts there as well. Worth a shot, but it's true that channel 3 is all we'll need after the transition to DTV.

I prefer analog potentiometers and switches to on-screen menus as well. Like Jeff noted, if the controller chip goes bad, it may not be worth the time and money to fix the set. Whereas, in an older TV, the controls usually just need some DeOxit cleaner and/or their board's solder joints reflowed.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-30-2009, 03:03 PM
radiotvnut's Avatar
radiotvnut radiotvnut is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 6,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by spkrman57 View Post
Interesting Magnavox 19" I have.

It is a digital chnl selection, Model RD4258SL with date of OCtober 83.

One label says "NAP Consumer Electronics"

All I can say is I hooked up a DVD player to it and the picture was incredibly sharp.

I have had one problem with it though, I lost chnl 10 a few weeks ago. I was using antenna since I currently have no cable service. The other VHF chnls come in ok though.

I just got my converter coupons yesterday and will get a converter to keep using this nice running TV. Plus I love the fact that there is a flip down drawer for all the adjustments, none of that on-screen modern garbage they sell now days.

I did buy a new digital TV, a LG 22", not bad but smaller than my Magnavox 19" for overall viewing across the room!

Did Magnavox have NAP build this TV set for them?

Regards, Ron
That '83 Magnavox sounds like the set my family had during my childhood. It was a 19" set in a woodgrain plastic case. It had a green LED readout and buttons for power, volume up, volume down, channel up, and channel down. Below those buttons was a fold down door that hid the other customer adjustments. I think it used the 19C2 chassis. That set saw heavy use until it was gotten rid of around '95 when the CRT got too weak to make a decent picture. My dad bought it used in '84 from our TV man for $150. I wish 19" color TVs were still worth $150 on the used market.

That loss of channel 10 could be due to loose connections in the tuner and where the tuner plugs into the chassis.

I don't know when NAP actually bought Magnavox. I've heard '74, '78, and '80. I do know that they bought Magnavox before they bought the consumer electronics division of GTE (Sylvania/Philco). Sometime in '81, NAP bought the consumer electronics division from GTE, which included the Sylvania and Philco names. GTE had already purchased Philco from Ford around '75. I have a 19" Philco-GTE set that was made in April, '81. I think it was one of the very last pre-NAP Philco's.

NAP sets were, for the most part, decent quality up until the late '90's. Then, the quality really went downhill. As with other old brand names, Magnavox is now pretty much just a name slapped on Funai trash.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-30-2009, 03:08 PM
radiotvnut's Avatar
radiotvnut radiotvnut is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 6,025
Oh, and I'm another one that likes the old pot controls. When dealing with on screen adjustments, I often have to think "do I move from one adjustment with the volume or channel buttons". It seems like all sets have a slightly different way of getting around in the menu. Also, many sets do not have a menu button on the set and a remote must be used. Many times, a universal remote will not do the job. An original remote must be used and those are often expensive or NLA.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #21  
Old 04-30-2009, 03:40 PM
Kiwick's Avatar
Kiwick Kiwick is offline
slave to 3 equines
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by zenith2134 View Post
The chassis were designed by Philips and the CRT's are Sylvanias as far as I can tell.
The chassis in this TV doesn't look like it has anything to do with Philips, the layout is very different, of course a NTSC chassis has to be different from the European PAL ones i'm used to, but 80s Philips designs are always very distinctive anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-30-2009, 06:08 PM
zenith2134's Avatar
zenith2134 zenith2134 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UTC -4
Posts: 2,546
I of course can be mistaken Kiwick. Not sure now.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-30-2009, 06:50 PM
spkrman57's Avatar
spkrman57 spkrman57 is offline
wrongsideofthetracks
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Columbus. Ohio
Posts: 30
I like the knobs and switches as I can do more than one at once and don't have to wait for the on-screen image to go away before I can adjust the next one.

BTW - It might have something to do with the fact that I'm past the half century mark and like the way things were done in the old days.

Regards, Ron
__________________
JBL pro for home use
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-30-2009, 07:20 PM
zenith2134's Avatar
zenith2134 zenith2134 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UTC -4
Posts: 2,546
Hi Ron- I'm only 20 and I prefer the old fashioned way too.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-30-2009, 09:50 PM
Jeffhs's Avatar
Jeffhs Jeffhs is offline
<----Zenith C845
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fairport Harbor, Ohio (near Lake Erie)
Posts: 4,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by spkrman57 View Post
BTW - It might have something to do with the fact that I'm past the half century mark and like the way things were done in the old days.

Regards, Ron
I'm over fifty years old myself (will be 53 in July), and remember well the mechanical tuners, pots, etc. used in older TVs, but to be perfectly honest, I don't miss them (every TV I ever had when I was a kid until I was in my 30s had rotary pot controls and, in all but one of my sets in the '80s, mechanical switch-type and turret tuners). However, time does march on and only goes forward; we will never again, in this age of digital everything, see the likes of mechanical TV tuners and rotary controls. Moreover, the days when one could get a new analog CRT TV are gone as well, for the most part, unless one can find a store that's selling off its inventory of such sets to make room for HD flat panels.

Today's sets with the jungle IC can develop more than just OSD display problems if that chip goes bad, as most of the set's control circuits are on the chip; it all depends on what part of the IC goes. My RCA CTC185 XL-100, for example, developed a problem with its jungle IC after I'd had the set about a year; the technician who repaired the set (for an unrelated problem) told me it would cost at least $100 to replace and reprogram the chip. The warranty had expired by this time, so I decided against the latter and am now using the TV as it is. The set works very well, is in daily use with OTA signals, a VCR and a DVD player, and makes a beautiful picture, so I really don't know to this day (eight years later) what the tech meant when he said part of the jungle IC was defective. Perhaps I'd notice the problem if I were using the set on an antenna, but since I have cable it doesn't show--probably because the cable signal is much stronger than any antenna signal would be in my area.

BTW, I agree with the person who said in a previous post that universal TV remotes often do not control every conceivable function of today's sets, making it almost imperative that the original remote be used if the more exotic functions are desired. Again using my RCA CTC185 as an example, the commercial-skip function only works with the set's original remote; every universal remote I've used with this set (including a GE universal I bought for $5 at Big Lots a couple years ago, and still use today, so I could use one remote for my TV, VCR and DVD) has operated all functions except the commercial skip.

IMHO, it depends on personal preferences. If all one wants is control of basic functions of a TV and/or VCR/DVD, most universals will work just fine. However, for full control of every function available on any of these devices, in most cases the original remote(s) must be used. If the original(s) is/are lost, damaged or quit(s) for any reason, and a universal remote doesn't operate some special functions of your devices, you're out of luck as far as those functions are concerned. Since, as has been noted, many original TV remotes are difficult to find, are NLA (no longer available), or have been lost or broken, as is often the case with some TVs offered for auction on eBay, universal remotes are being used in place of the originals, but the tradeoff is, again, loss of some functions offered by the remote that came with the set. However, many people are just happy to have a remote again (after the original breaks or quits for whatever reason) and could not care less about the lesser-used functions such as commercial skip and the like, so they won't mind that these extra functions may not work with a universal controller. I know at least one person who doesn't use her TV remote for anything but turning the set on/off, adjusting volume and changing channels; she just ignores the rest of the buttons, including mute. A universal remote would suit this person just fine, and would accomodate her VCR and DVD as well.
__________________
Jeff, WB8NHV

Collecting, restoring and enjoying vintage Zenith radios since 2002

Zenith. Gone, but not forgotten.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #26  
Old 04-30-2009, 11:11 PM
bgadow's Avatar
bgadow bgadow is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Federalsburg, MD
Posts: 5,865
I'm curious if Philips ever did use a "worldwide" chassis in the US? I recall his being brought up before. NAP was a very high volume manufacturer at one time and so could have very well designed those for here only.

'75 seems to be the most mentioned year for the sale of Magnavox. I have read that the logo change that took place in the 70s had to do with this sale-the older one was "Magnavox" and the newer one "MAGNAVOX" in capitals. I have also read that the old Magnavox company remained as a maker of commercial or industrial equipment and kept the old logo for their use. I know I've seen some "old logo" sets up into the '76-77 era. Apparently when NAP bought that business it moved production from the old Ft. Wayne facilities down to the all new plant in Greeneville, TN. I know the Sylvania plant was in Batavia, NY but I've never seen an indication of where picture tubes were made after the sale. There are a couple people on AK who would know as they worked at (or with) the company at that time. I enjoy reading the history, and like to see that we have the facts straight.

There were at least 2 things that NAP really wanted, that it obtained from buying GTE's consumer electronics division. It got the crt production, and it got the Philco name. As mentioned elsewhere, there was a longstanding agreement that the Philips name could not be used in the USA as it was too similiar to Philco. Once NAP owned the name they could do anything they wanted. NAP never owned the Sylvania name, though...they only licensed it from GTE (which continued using it on lighting and such until it sold that division to Osram). The Sylvania name as used nowadays on consumer electronics is licensed from Osram to Funai or somebody.
__________________
Bryan
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-01-2009, 03:48 AM
Kiwick's Avatar
Kiwick Kiwick is offline
slave to 3 equines
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 448
The only 80s Philips "world" chassis with NTSC capability i'm aware of is the CTO-N, it was built in the 1983-1985 time frame.

Here's a Philips CTO-N set, model 16CT6425/51S: http://www.marcelstvmuseum.com/photoalbum83.html

as you can see here: http://www.marcelstvmuseum.com/phili...nenkant01.html, the typical Philips chassis layout and passive components (philips always used their own capacitors back then) are totally different from the Magnavox chassis

Take a closer look at the CRT socket board, ALL philips boards carry a Philips "XXXX XXX XXXX X" part code somewhere, You can also see the way the PCB tracks are designed, this is another unique Philips feature

Last edited by Kiwick; 05-01-2009 at 03:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-01-2009, 07:03 AM
zenith2134's Avatar
zenith2134 zenith2134 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UTC -4
Posts: 2,546
Thanks for that information, bgadow. Very good stuff...I like to hear these stories as well.

Now that I think of it, I am most likely wrong about the chassis being a Philips. I just thought it was their design since they did own Magnavox in '84. The capacitors are NOT branded Philips, they're Nichicons. However, the small horizontal transformer is a Philips and at least one other part I saw also was.

From your pics, Kiwick, the traces on the neckboard do look similar but the chassis layout does not.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-01-2009, 09:44 AM
spkrman57's Avatar
spkrman57 spkrman57 is offline
wrongsideofthetracks
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Columbus. Ohio
Posts: 30
I don't have a problem with digital chnl tuning, I'm talking about adjusting the picture quality. I still prefer knobs for that purpose.

52 in July!

Ron
__________________
JBL pro for home use
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-01-2009, 05:11 PM
zenith2134's Avatar
zenith2134 zenith2134 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UTC -4
Posts: 2,546
Quick question about the proper setting of the CRT cutoff and Drive controls:

As found, the controls were all down all the way, and the master G2 control was up higher than I'd like.

What I did was increase the blue cutoff a tad since the greyscale was brownish in low-light conditions. I left the RGB drives alone. I also turned the G2 back a little since the brightness pot had plenty of extra gain which wasn't needed.

Now, when there is an exceptionally contrasty raster (like certain commercials) the color gets kind of washed out (yellow, in particular looks kind of lifeless)

I'm going to open the set again and re-do everything. FWIW, I let the set warm up for 30 minutes before adjustments.

Basically, I've set up many tv's before and haven't encountered this phenomenon. Any tips on getting the best possible color picture from this TV? Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.