![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Around here I haven't seen many new VHS blanks for some time now. Quality? I wish. And don't get me started on blank audio cassettes. Those have been gone for a long time now...
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I must confess that I was one of those that thought recording to CD-R was better than recording to cassette until I got a taste of CD-R's. First, my $200 Sony stand alone CD recorder only lasted just shy of 2 years before it went belly up. Second, I never have been able to make a recording with this new windows vista PC. For some reason, the sound card won't accept a line level signal. Third, I'm finding that several of the CD's that I made in the past are now starting to "act ugly". And, not because I abused them. It seems that some CD's do not stand up to those "last forever" claims that were made when CD's first came on the scene. About the only thing I can say for CD-R's is that I can play them in the car (no tape deck there) and I can jump to whatever track I want without having to FF and rewind a tape. I suspect that blank magnetic tape media will be unavailable on the new market in 5-10 years. I need to find some decent R2R blanks as well. I have a couple of R2R machines that I might like to use again. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have used good quality Hi-Fi VCRs running at SP speed since 1986, knowing they couldn't match the picture quality of my LaserDisc collection. But I have well-made Maxell VHS's from 1983 that play just fine. Tape housings were far better made 10-20 years ago, too. The secret was then, and is now, to use the best tape you can get in a good quality machine, and don't run the heck out of the tape 5 times a day like a kiddie video! Today I have a pair of Pioneer DVD recorders(2005 & 2006 models, no HD) that I can feed VHS-LaserDisc-Hi8-DVD-Rs into, but I still TAPE off the digital cable box because I too think that burned DVD-R/+R & CD-Rs ain't "forever" media. They're very good & convenient for distribution to folks, & so far in 4 years I've not had a DVD-R failure but HAVE had a half dozen CD-Rs go bad on me in the last 8 years(out of hundreds burned in both Pioneer & Sony CD recorders-the Pioneer is a 2000 PDR-W739 model & is GREAT!). So the whole idea of building a video media library has turned into a big fat crap-shoot. My newest Hi-Fi VCR standalone is a 2003 Mitsubishi(still made with some heft then), & I routinely use RCA, JVC, Mitsubishi units from the mid-1990s. Again, using them keeps the belts from getting "set spots" & keeping them plugged in allows a trickle voltage to be there always-good for capacitors. It's a good thing I have less than 10 of any given equipment type in any given format, or I'd have to spend half me wakin' hours just doing maintainence! Dennis Forkel Indianapolis |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
You know, I think VHS is one format that *should* die. Keep vinyl, keep analog TV, but shit can VHS!
My reasoning for this is not only do digital recordings offer better quality, they don't degrade over time. A VHS tape degrades each time its played. Also, there's the jittering dots at the bottom of the picture, flagging at the bottom, especally as a tape wears out, and all those moving parts WILL eventually break. I can fit a whole movie, of better then VHS quality, onto a USB thumb drive and play it on my home theater PC. That thumb drive easily fits in my pocket. A VHS tape won't. VHS quality at its best. :P
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Radiotvnut, yeah the 120 minute ones have 'bad' written all over em. I like a nice 90 minute per side cassette, Chrome preferably. TDK used to make one helluva cassette tape. Get a nice 3 head Teac and enjoy near-R2R quality!
MRX, yeah VHS was never the best format. Beta looks better, to me at least. SVHS ain't bad though. One of the only analog video formats with its own connector type
|
| Audiokarma |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some people are still attracted to Vinyl records because of their superior audio qualty.
Some people are attracted to roundies because of their vivid lollipop colors. Some people are attracted to vacuum tube amplifiers because of their sound quality. VHS wasn't a very good format to begin with. Beta was better, but it died. Digital video, if encoded and compressed correctly, will even beat beta in picture quality. One can literally fit several DVD quality movies onto a chip the size of a quarter, and USB thumb drives of adequate capacity are probably cheaper now then VHS tapes were back in their hay day. To me, it makes VHS obsolete. DVR's can record programs, those recordings can be saved to a DVD, or a memory card even. The only real cons are if too much compression is used, but that can be compared to the SP, LP, or EP quality levels in VHS. And finally: a VHS tape can only hold so much on it. Maybe 8 hours max at the lowest quality setting. Memory cards and thumb drives just keep getting more and more capacity, while becoming smaller and smaller. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
...and cheaper. You have a very valid point.
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Kmart has maxell so does FYE music store, Dollar general has TDK, I use my mitsubishi to watch old vhs have like 200 tapes, i use the blanks to record on the HI Fi track cuz the vcr has vu meters and manual audio rec level
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Seriously. RIP, VHS.
__________________
"There has been an alarming increase in the things you know nothing about." --fortune |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Beta pix quality did beat out VHS a little in the beginning, but the mechanical complexity of Beta was a whole other issue. Hard if not impossible to produce a Beta transport mechanism that could compete with the cost of a VHS.
Pix quality wise, originally Beta could reproduce about 270 lines of horizontal resolution vs VHS 250 lines because it was not possible at the time with that technology to record much over 3 mHz onto the tape, and both formats had to downconvert the 3.58 mHz chroma to a lower frequency (with a drastic reduction in color resolution as a result) to get it on the tape. But when S-VHS came along that pretty much blew away any picture quality issues, as S-VHS's 400 lines of resolution exceeded broadcast video's 330 lines. As far as recording video onto digital media, specifically DVD-R discs, how many times now have I heard or read of DVD-Rs people have archived their old tapes onto, not playing after only a few years? Likewise with the permanence of a flash memory drive. However I have Beta and VHS tapes that are 30 years old or older that still play fine. |
| Audiokarma |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
000
Last edited by andy; 12-07-2021 at 04:29 PM. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
I heard on the news yesterday, that VHS tapes were not going to be made after this year. Sorry, the radio announcer did not state his source.
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"There has been an alarming increase in the things you know nothing about." --fortune |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I remember when the SL-2500 Sony's first front-loader came out and they were breaking the guide pins off the loading ring left and right, a major repair, along with the FL shaft plastic gears. And the SL-5400 generation with their seizing capstan motors. We were both Zenith and Sony authorized service and were running sometimes 2-3 weeks turnaround from the backlog of Beta machines! |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's quicker and easier to make copies of digital video. Copying one VHS tape to another requires either two VCR's, or one of those double decker VCR's, and the quality of the copy will be inferior to the original, maybe not noticibly inferior if you're using a high quality tape and a double decker VCR, but there will be degradation. You can copy a (non DRMed) digital video an unlimited amount of times, to anything that has suitable capacity, and it will never degrade. It can be damaged if the medium is damaged, but as with all data, it can be backed up, and storage capacity is just getting smaller and cheaper. |
| Audiokarma |
![]() |
|
|