View Single Post
  #13  
Old 09-20-2019, 04:41 PM
Electronic M's Avatar
Electronic M Electronic M is offline
M is for Memory
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pewaukee/Delafield Wi
Posts: 15,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Popester View Post
I never liked RCA design with their flyback. Your picture showed what always happened when they failed. Hence why I preferred Zenith as I thought them more reliable. But they had high tripler failures so maybe what I thought was less repairs was really a wash when comparing apples to oranges. But for all the Sonys I have around I must say they were pretty hard to beat in picture and repair quality. Yes I am biased toward Sony. 📺
Zenith didn't implement tripplers on their their tube sets AFAIK (unless the 4 tube hybrids had it, never owned a 4 tuber despite having most of their other chassis). So you were comparing apples to oranges.....RCA had tripplers in their SS sets just like Zenith and they sucked just as bad as any other trippler in any other set.
__________________
Tom C.

Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off!
What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4
Reply With Quote