Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early Color Television

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2019, 03:43 PM
Pete Deksnis's Avatar
Pete Deksnis Pete Deksnis is offline
15GP22 demo @ ETF 2007
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Big Rapids, MI
Posts: 762
The best reason I've heard to date is that there was a legal issue, probably with Philco, who came up with the quadrature modulation method of stuffing two chrome signals into the existing NTSC monochrome standard. By shifting the I signal to the R-Y axis, poof! no RCA $ going to Philco.

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-14-2019, 05:30 PM
Tim Tress Tim Tress is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania
Posts: 109
Also likely the reason that Zenith used the "sheet beam" demodulators when they developed their debut color chassis, the 29JC20. No stinkin' patent money going to RCA, although they did have to use an RCA picture tube and deflection components in that set. I'll bet that Sarnoff laughed, all the way to the bank!

Last edited by Tim Tress; 05-14-2019 at 05:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-14-2019, 06:04 PM
Electronic M's Avatar
Electronic M Electronic M is offline
M is for Memory
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pewaukee/Delafield Wi
Posts: 15,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Tress View Post
Also likely the reason that Zenith used the "sheet beam" demodulators when they developed their debut color chassis, the 29JC20. No stinkin' patent money going to RCA, although they did have to use an RCA picture tube and deflection components in that set. I'll bet that Sarnoff laughed, all the way to the bank!
I think Zenith used those demods till they replaced them with SS components.

Zenith may have had to buy those parts, but RCA had to pay Zenith for their little old inventions of Electromagnetic convergence and FM MPX stereo so I imagine it was a case of 'you begrudgingly scratch my back and I'll begrudgingly scratch yours'.
__________________
Tom C.

Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off!
What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:43 PM
stromberg67's Avatar
stromberg67 stromberg67 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ellington CT
Posts: 180
The one I like best is that RCA had to pay royalties to CBS for the color CRT patents CBS developed to improve the tubes. I'll bet Sarnoff wasn't pleased.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-15-2019, 10:15 AM
benman94's Avatar
benman94 benman94 is offline
Resident Lunatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by stromberg67 View Post
The one I like best is that RCA had to pay royalties to CBS for the color CRT patents CBS developed to improve the tubes. I'll bet Sarnoff wasn't pleased.
RCA engineers couldn't see the forest for the trees so to speak. The 15HP22 and 19VP22 were a huge leap forward, and it would have been insane for RCA to release what essentially amounted to a 19 inch 15GP22 with the suspended dot plate. The 15GP22 never should have been released in production sets. The CBS 19VP22 was about the first truly practical, more modern color CRT, and even that was a bit of a dog due to very poor quality control. The 21AXP22 was better yet.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.