Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Diagnostic & Test Equipment

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2014, 03:56 PM
powerking powerking is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: New Hampshire, U.S.A.
Posts: 126
I would bet that the Heathkit C-2/C-3 circuit design is very close to the Solar CB/CC one(s) or even copied directly (since Solar, Inc went out of business in 1945 or so). My CB-1-60 also used 2 8uF caps for the +500VDC supply in the leakage resistor divider network. I would bet that using a 250V cap to replace them is a bad idea; perhaps measure the voltage across them and make sure it not 500V! For my CB-1-60 restore, I have 2-22uF 400V caps in series with 330K-ohm (voltage balance) restistors across them. These old testers are all similar designs (not too much to a Wien bridge circuit).

Tom (PK)

Last edited by powerking; 04-29-2014 at 04:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-30-2014, 03:16 PM
Notimetolooz's Avatar
Notimetolooz Notimetolooz is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 548
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerking View Post
I would bet that the Heathkit C-2/C-3 circuit design is very close to the Solar CB/CC one(s) or even copied directly (since Solar, Inc went out of business in 1945 or so). My CB-1-60 also used 2 8uF caps for the +500VDC supply in the leakage resistor divider network. I would bet that using a 250V cap to replace them is a bad idea; perhaps measure the voltage across them and make sure it not 500V! For my CB-1-60 restore, I have 2-22uF 400V caps in series with 330K-ohm (voltage balance) restistors across them. These old testers are all similar designs (not too much to a Wien bridge circuit).

Tom (PK)
Yes, I think most of these testers use very similar circuits. One replacement cap is 500V, but since the other one is the supply for the eye tube I went with a 250V. I even measured the voltage without the eye tube to see how much it would rise without the current draw on that side, turned out to be 200V if I recall. I could've/should've made them both 500V for simplicity but I went this way. The max plate voltage spec for the eye tube is 250, so if it goes higher I'll have other problems.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-2014, 12:13 PM
dieseljeep dieseljeep is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notimetolooz View Post
Yes, I think most of these testers use very similar circuits. One replacement cap is 500V, but since the other one is the supply for the eye tube I went with a 250V. I even measured the voltage without the eye tube to see how much it would rise without the current draw on that side, turned out to be 200V if I recall. I could've/should've made them both 500V for simplicity but I went this way. The max plate voltage spec for the eye tube is 250, so if it goes higher I'll have other problems.
Funny thing is, is that Heathkit always seemed to use parts, at that time, that were available cheap. A classic example is the use of their famous 12A6 tube. The unit shown uses a 1626, 12 volt high frequency triode with the plate and grid strapped together and used as a rectifier. They also used a power transformer with a 12 volt heater winding, to use all those war surplus tubes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.