![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
In battle, in forest, at the precipice in the mountains, On the dark great sea, in the midst of javelins and arrows, In sleep, in confusion, in the depths of shame, The good deeds a man has done before defend him. --Bhagavad-Gita |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
HA! Never said it was. I hate TV as much as the next guy. When I patch up a set after repairs, I put it aside and it rarely gets used. Idiotbox=Unnecessary. Emergency? Radios are fine!
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Different, perhaps, in the city where there are news/talk stations and such. The old-style community broadcasters are gone for the most part.
__________________
Bryan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The problem with commercial radio stations is that they do not broadcast emergency weather information anymore-at least around here(TX). With all of the equipment(dual doppler radar, hail detectors, etc.) purchased by the TV stations, TV has taken over the weather information role.
Of course you can buy the specialized weather radios(I have one), but this is still not near the information that can be gleaned from a TV weather warning. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some parts of the country get tornadoes, and you really would like to see live radar maps of your region on TV. Many DTV stations have sub-channels that display weather info. Portable DTV sets would be good to have, and there's a proposed mobile TV add on to the ATSC standard just released. Severe weather info would be an excellent use for that mobile TV. This mobile TV standard is designed with more rugged error correction and reception under lousy conditions.
__________________
|
| Audiokarma |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
We have a station here that broadcasts weather on a subchannel. The problem is RECEIVING the information during bad weather. It has been my experience to date that I receive a frozen picture and no sound on all DTV channels during fairly strong thundersorms. This is while analog, although somewhat snowy, continues right along. It is a weakness in the DTV technology, not what is being broadcast.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/72382 Probably for small handheld displays like those on fancy cell phones. If it works, the reception would be more robust than regular ATSC set top boxes, and hopefully future full size DTV sets could use this new mobile/ handheld signal as a fallback if full HD reception goes bad. Assuming the program is a simulcast of the regular HD program. "Central to the M/H system are additions to the physical layer of the ATSC transmission system that are easily decodable under high Doppler rate conditions. Extra training sequences and forward error correction (FEC) are added to assist reception of the enhanced stream(s). Consideration has also been given to the many system details that make such a signal compatible with legacy ATSC receivers, particularly audio decoder buffer constraints; but also such constraints as MPEG transport packet header standards, requirements for legacy PSIP carriage, etc. These changes do not alter the emitted spectral characteristics." -- page 12 of http://www.atsc.org/standards/cs_doc...1-ATSC-M-H.pdf
__________________
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sounds like it won't hurt. I wonder why this was not done in the first place.
I would only expect standard definition(good enough for weather info) in the condtions they describe, not High def. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|