![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I still haven't seen an LCD that I like. They're great for computer monitors, but they just don't look right for video. They tend to look flat and lifeless to me, particularly on moving images. I can spot the difference between an LCD and a plasma from 10 feet away. Plasma and CRT both look more film like to me.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is all a matter of taste, then. In February 2003, I was in a store in Akihabara in Tokyo, Japan full of TV sets. I remember thinking "flat panel, yeah, another flat panel, yeah, oh my goodness what is THIS one?". It was Sharp's first 37" LCD, in a group of 37" and 42" plasma displays. All the plasmas just looked like a bunch of pixels, but that LCD was like looking through a window by comparison.
I also much prefer the non-glare finish of most LCD panels versus the shiny glass surface of plasma displays. 1960's roundie color CRTs got that right; I don't know when or why the glare-inducing smooth screens came back.
__________________
Chris Quote from another forum: "(Antique TV collecting) always seemed to me to be a fringe hobby that only weirdos did." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|