| LukeSimon |
12-01-2021 06:03 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electronic M
(Post 3237996)
If it's labeled for both it should work in both applications...If it didn't warranty claims would have sunk them.
|
This makes the most sense to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil
(Post 3237998)
The difference between 38.5 and 40 watts dissipation is irrelevant, besides, no sane designer would design for a tube to operate at its maximum rating. Tube life would be poor.
|
Agreed the difference is small, but while operating at the max rating would not be done, "derating" that is operating at some fraction of the max rating is how designing works, so any difference in the max rating means something because the derating fraction changes.
Tube life expectancy depends mostly on how much derating is used for max cathode current and max plate power. Looking at different 6LF6 tubes, it appears as though the 6LF6/6MH6 labeled tubes have the plate design for 40W (example being the heat dissipating fins at the top), and while I can't see the cathodes, I am going to guess that they are the 500mA current rated cathodes, which should make the tube last much much longer than a vanilla 6LF6 that has cathodes rated for 400mA.
I'd also like to remark that 500mA DC cathode current is incredibly impressive! Industrial vacuum tubes for radio and TV broadcast towers top out at 400mA DC cathode current, though they do have much higher plate power ratings than 40W. Non-solid state TVs had some impressive components inside them, and this 6MH6 horizontal sweep tube is a good example.
|