Quote:
Originally Posted by electronjohn
(Post 2824772)
Yeah...I've been extra alert for something on the curb...but being in a lessly-populated area doesn't provide for many nifty curbside finds.
|
I hear ya. I live in a small town (population 3,215) outside Cleveland, and have seen very few (if any) old TVs on the treelawns lately (the last one I remember seeing was a 1978 RCA color console on the next street over from my apartment, about seven years ago). Perhaps the reason I haven't seen any flat panels around these parts (at all, yet) is that folks around here are taking advantage of the TV recycling options offered by Best Buy, but that still doesn't explain why I haven't seen more CRT sets by the side of the road on trash day. I would think that with all TV being digital now, folks would be getting rid of their CRTs left and right and replacing them with FPs. Oh well. Perhaps they are holding on to the old sets and using converters, or maybe, just maybe some of them have gotten tired of having to contend with the OTA reception problems, don't want cable or satellite, and have given up altogether on watching TV. I wouldn't be surprised if they are having reception problems, as in this area, one channel (WKYC 3, NBC in Cleveland) never even reached here in analog and probably would not get here in digital either; channels 5, 8, 19, 25, 43, and 61 reach here, all right, but the reception using rabbit ears is fair to poor at best, with channel 19, the CBS affiliate, is really the only station that comes in well enough to watch with an indoor antenna, and that was when the station was transmitting an analog signal. The digital signal from this station is probably the only one anyone using an antenna around here will be able to watch, without going to either a converter box or cable/satellite. Many people don't like paying for TV service (even ultra-basic or what I call "bare-bones basic" service such as Time-Warner offers, which is local channels only and is something on the order of $11.70 a month), but here, most folks have TW cable or satellite, having done away with their old antenna years ago. In the far eastern Cleveland suburb where I grew up, cable didn't arrive until 1982. Before then, many people in that suburb had to use rather large antennas to get decent pictures on the network stations (my neighbor in my hometown, for example, had a very large far-suburban antenna installed on her chimney, with a mast-mounted preamplifier and coax downlead if I remember correctly, when she got a new color TV), but still could not receive certain channels such as PBS very well. Don't get me started on the reception problems that sprang up like mushrooms when FOX bought out channel 8 in Cleveland. That station had been a CBS affiliate for more than 40 years and, in many cases, was the best-received station in our area. (I know it was at my home at the time.) The CBS affiliation went to a 3.7-megawatt ERP UHF station in an eastern Cleveland suburb immediately thereafter (the two stations effectively swapped networks, as channel 19, the new UHF station I am referring to, was the FOX affiliate at the time). And then the problems began. Channel 19 reached the east side of Cleveland over-the-air just fine, but viewers without cable west of the city either could not get the station at all (this station, like all others in Cleveland and the rest of the U.S. at that time [mid-1980s] was transmitting solely analog) or else they received it with much less than a city-grade signal. This did not put the station in a very good light, as it was now an affiliate of CBS-TV. I don't know if anything was ever done to improve their signal or to reshape their signal pattern to better serve all greater Cleveland, but I guess that doesn't matter these days since many folks now get their TV reception by means other than antennas. Even when 19 would sign off at 2 a.m. (in the days before infomercials and 24x7 TV), it would not mention where its transmitter was located, although 43, 55 and 61 (the only commercial UHF stations in Cleveland) weren't afraid to mention the city from which they transmitted their super-power signals (43 eventually installed a 5-megawatt ERP transmitter so it could reach the Akron-Canton, Ohio area, 30-some miles south, as well as Cleveland and environs.
Reception problems (with analog) such as the ones with Cleveland's CBS channel 19 were bad enough then. The problems folks can and likely will have with receiving that station's (and others--Cleveland has seven commercial OTA TV stations and several translators) digital signal with an antenna and a box in some areas could be huge indeed. I bet the cable operator in this area is being kept busier than a one-armed paper hanger, doing bare-bones basic cable installations in homes all over northeastern Ohio--including the outlying areas far beyond Cleveland.