![]() |
'39 Motorola "Picnic" portable
1 Attachment(s)
Some call these sets that. I call them "luggage-style" portables. In the pre-war years these sets had nice big chassis' and very often tweed cloth covering with multi-colored or brown stripes. Those are my favorites. The post-war models often had wimpier chassis' and non-striped tolex covering. This 1939 Motorola 41D has an unusual dial. Off, you see a decorative "Batteries Off" plate. When you turn it on that plate swiftly springs to the left revealing the numbered dial plate behind it. Someone killed all 4 tubes sometime in it's past, but with the help of a friend and modern batteries it lives again! It's one of the best playing battery-only portables I've ever heard too. Very sensitive with plenty of volume.
http://videokarma.org/attachment.php...0&d=1543079705 |
very nice!
|
Quote:
|
Back when radios were cool!
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
These are so inexpensive and fun that I got another one. This is a cute cube-shape stlyed 1939 Emerson CT-275. Again, it has the old "luggage-style" striped tweed case, and is battery only. With modern batteries and a friend going over the chassis, it is an excellent little performer. Sensitive, clear, and with a nice mellow tone. The red mark on the left side bottom of the dial designates that it is on. When you turn it off it's gold.
http://videokarma.org/attachment.php...7&d=1543723960 |
I be liking that two band!
|
Quote:
. |
Quote:
|
These are great fun! :thmbsp:
I have always wondered why they don’t seem to be more popular among radio collectors. I’m guessing that many are avoided because of the batteries, but it is really easy to make a workable battery pack, and with more effort, duplicate the appearance of the original pack. :scratch2: Could you post a picture of the Motorola “turned on”, so that we might see the dial markings after the dial changes? jr |
Quote:
I still have to build one up like that. For a power transformer, I use a transformer from a scrap VTVM or other obsolete, worthless test equipment. Total line isolation! |
I love battery tube sets! all mine are post war though. I've got a funky red Motorola one that does three way power and a battery only bakelite Emerson. I also have a "recipe" for homemade 67 1/2 volt batteries.
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I don't concern myself with the look of the batteries. A single "D" and a series of 10 9V's is easy to tuck into the back of these early sets. With limited collector use, the batteries last for a good long time. Here's the Motorola turned-on with the "Batteries Off" plate out of the way. It's really cool how it springs back and forth! http://videokarma.org/attachment.php...8&d=1543788207 |
Very nice... thanks for posting! Still scratching my head trying to figure out where the other plate goes. :scratch2:
jr |
Quote:
The springing action isn't abrupt. I happens swiftly, but rather softy. I'm glad it's a tension wire rather than springs because I doubt it would be still working! |
Quote:
I have a Motorola model 41H that looks like the one pictured, only a 3 way job. That is one interesting circuit, using the resistance line cord from H*ll, dissipates 38.25 watts. :scratch2: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd imagine reason for owning one would be similar to the reason for having a Walkman in the 80s or 90s sure your average home stereo had a cassette deck that was better by all measures, and you already own a home stereo, but that thing is not practical to take with you on your daily walk to _______. Some time ago I read a piece on the first small portables with miniature tubes pre WWII and there was an ad for a IIRC Sonora portable advertisement that had a picture of a lady jogging with the set strapped to her arm.... It sort of blew me away how ahead of it's time that ad seemed to be. |
Quote:
. |
Quote:
Batteries were fairly expensive for a kid whose source of income was doing dishes and mowing lawns, but I assure you that that many sets of batteries were purchased for the set. IIRC, a 67.5 “B” battery was $2.75 and the “A” cells were just inexpensive (25cent) flashlight “D” cells. A “B” battery outlasted the “A” cells about 3 to 1. jr |
Quote:
PS WISCOJIM - I'd like to see that ad with the woman jogging with an early portable set. It would be way ahead of it's time! Although some of the "camera-style" portables were small, with the batteries installed they were not exactly super-light. They were not really practical to run with. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
On many battery portables, the volume by design couldn't be turned all the way down, so as to prevent the radio from being left on unintentionally.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A few other firms built a variation of same. They sounded a lot better than the others that ran the battery output tube when using it on AC or DC. |
Quote:
|
3 Attachment(s)
This western air patrol has been in my collection for about 25 years. I really like the simplicity of the design, and the proportions of the cabinet. I ran it off 9 volt batteries in series for the B cell, and a couple of Ds for the A cell. It worked nice, I should try it again some time.
http://videokarma.org/attachment.php...0&d=1543953472 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That's easy enough to do! I'm not really actively collecting radios right now, but they do tend to find me from time to time. I do like the complete absence of hum with battery portables. The one battery set I'd really like to get my hands on is the R-100/URR morale radio from the second world war.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Most were made by Majestic and used locktal and octal tubes. I have two and the backs are missing on both. :sigh: |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.