![]() |
CRV59-AAE Military Iconoscope Camera restoration
I am beginning the restoration process on the CRV59-AAE Military Iconoscope Camera (and spare Iconoscope) that I bought at the May RTF meeting.
Some time ago I ordered uo from Mouser the needed list of parts. The only odd ones are for the power supply. First is the power transformer for the +405 and -50 volt supplies, which is a Hammond 290EX Guitar Amp transformer. It has the requisite 50 volt (RMS) tap for the -50v. The +27 volt filament and bias supply is a Meanwell LRF-150F-24 switching supply to which I intend to add a bit of switching crap filtration. Last night I had again inspected the chassis, tried to remove the bad-looking iconoscope, and tried following wires and testing pots. I could not get the iconosocpe out. It looked like the yoke was set to make that impossible without removing pots. Today I bought new batteries for my flashlight and inspected better: yes, there is an adjustment and if moved a bit the tube comes out safely. All the stuff I tested looks OK especially the low-ohm pots I was able to test in-circuit. Except that the bias lamp appears missing entirely, no lamp, no wire, no socket. Huh??? The shutter was removed previously. With the old iconoscope out I was able to test it in a tube tester for emission and gas (transconductance too, but that's expected to be very very low). I had previously tested the new one, and it looked OK. The old one is clearly very very gassy, and a retest of the new one under identical settings shows no gas. There is hope! Next up is lots and lots of photos and more circuit tracing. Has anyone else around here other than McVoy had any experience with one of these? Doug McDonald |
I have now replaced all the 450 volt (B+) electrolytics, C127, C142, C101, C126.
The first two are cans in the main part and were restuffed. C101 was not resutuffed because the tabs were too stiff to twist into removal position. C126 was not resutffed out of "symmetry" with C101, and there's a nice spot for it. The two 0.05 uF caps in the preamp area were replaced with modern ones (C113 and C114). I have not decided whether to replace the LV (15 volt) electrolytics, C147 and C115. C115 would be easy, C147 even more impossible than C101, to restuff, so if they are bad they will just have their wires cut and the replacements tacked in. These caps are usually OK. |
All the tubular paper caps are now replaced.
Next up is disconnecting the 6X5 plate and catghode and replacing with 1600PIV silicon diodes. Then I will test the +28 and -50 volt resistor chains using the 28 volt supply, and the +400 (no filament power) using a lab supply. |
It turns out that the modifications mentioned in the ham radio article,
to use AC on the filaments, were done at some point, and will have to be undone (very easy, but its good we have a local source for ordinary resistors and a few caps.). |
The circuit changes in the +28 volt area were undone, not physically easy, as big
wires were twisted on tightly. The 6x5s (except heaters) were removed from the circuit and replaced with 1800V PIV silicon diodes, these being specifically specified for damper and CRT supply use. The +28 and minus 50 circuits were checked out using the 28v supply and appear to work OK. Next is build the power supply. |
The 405 volt supply is built and tested. It was applied to the set
and immediately showed that R210, the 1000 resistor that feeds the gas regulator tubes, was open, These are still available. I was able to temporarily replace it with 200 ohm resistors in series. This showed that at least most of the B+ chain is working OK. Next up is the -50 volt supply, the noise filter for the 28 volt supply, and the power cable. |
The power supply is complete and connected.
The electronics, without the iconoscope, was turn completely on. All the various sections work. The vertical frequency adjust is out of range, it wont reach as high as 40Hz. This would not matter if I were forcing it to 60Hz, but I've not done that yet. My soldering iron died and the old 250 watt gun is too clumsy, so I'm out of doing changes until I can borrow one from a colleague's lab. |
I got a new iron.
I got the vertical in range. As designed it is NOT random interlace! It in fact is roughly (now) 260 x 60p. But at these extended frequencies (originally it was about 300 x 40p) the stability is marginal. I will continue testing before installing the iconoscope. |
Doug, would you by chance have any pictires of this restoration? That would really be interesting!
|
I have a very complete set of "before" pictures. I'm rather tired out this evening, so its
unsafe to do more work. I'll try to take the "after" pictures and ones of the power supply, which still lacks the sync modifier suggested bu McVoy. Today was devoted to troubleshooting (electronic tests only ... the first iconoscope test will be tomorrow). The power to the iconoscope filament was inadequate. It took quite a while to prove this, as I have no AC voltmeter that works at 16 kHz. I had to use an analog scope or compare filament brightness between two identical tubes, one on the camera and one on 6.3vac. Tomorrow I'll bring a digital scope that can do true RMS AC. The problem was that the screen resistor, supposed to be 82K, was 106K. This caused the screen voltage to drop to zero at high power, thus limiting. Even 82K did not work, I eventually used 60K. Then I worked more on the video amplifier chain. It was horrendously microphonic, as if there were a broken lead connection. There was., onC154, a 1000pF mica in series with a 0.05 uF film cap (??? WHY ... its not a high voltage area.?) It had a lead that was broken off about 1/2 millimeter inside its case. This was not easy to find, though tapping and poking eventually found it. Another source of problem was found in a noisy gain pot. This is wirewound 10K. At least for the moment is was fixed with DeOxit ... you have to take the case off and flood it, as the noise seems to come not from the wiper on the resistor element but on the connection of the wiper to the outside. The shading pots are similar, but are not so bad. |
1 Attachment(s)
The iconoscope I bought at the ETF convention is good.
The horrible white spot at the low left is present exatly the same without the iconoscope. It is caused by the scanning rulses being to long and ringing. Working on this is the next step. Picture attached. It is of a window looking out on a sunlit scene. All you see is the wooden things holding the panes of glass and the Venetian Blind slats. At lower left is the head of a wooden turtle (bought in Papua New Guinea!) and the corne of an RCA 9T249. |
After about an hour and a half running the image faded out.
Had the iconoscope gone bad? After leaving it off for 45 minutes and turning it back on, changing no adjustments, I got the very best picture I have seen, even though the sun had gone behind a cloud so it was a dimmer scene. Maybe something charged up? Is that why a bias light from the back? Time will tell. |
Here's a better picture, made just after turning on. I have seen better.
I have to turn up the iconoscope bias as it (or something?) warms up. It seems to work best with the iconoscope filament runnig at 5 to 5.7 volts RMS. |
Missing pictures?
|
Yes, missing picture. Its only somewhat better. I'll try
again tonight. I measured the iconoscope grid current. It is OK at turn on, then climbs to a couple of microamps when the picture fades, in tirection that gas makes. Thus, only a marginally good tube. Nevertheless, its a working demo. Ad placed for better 1846 iconoscope in the "usual suspect" classifieds. |
6 Attachment(s)
Here is the "better" screen image, and "before recapping" pictures of the chassis.
The bending at the top of the image has been fixed by adjustment of DC levels. "after" pics of chassis in next post. |
6 Attachment(s)
Here are the images, "after recapping" and other changes, of the chassis. Many changes are hard to see, but are there .. look at the 6X5s
for a bit of silicon. Next is the power supply ... it needs safety covers. Also the iconoscope. As you see, I'm lucky i'm works at all with that opaque yellow getter rim. |
Hey just wanna say it's awesome to see another one of these WWII block cameras get restored to working order and any Iconoscope camera in general, great work and look forward to seeing more on it!
I myself have built a crudely working Iconoscope camera using the same RCA 1846 tube type and driven by video/deflection circuits I made originally for a 2/3" vidicon camera, my Iconoscope camera construction log can be seen on my site starting from this page http://troysvintagevideo.0catch.com/...peproject.html . |
Last week I noticed another 1846 for sale on the 'bay. It had
a good center of the getters, clerly visible, so I bought it. It arrived yesterday and today I tried it. It works identically to my other semi-working one. It runs for about 15 to 30 minutes and then the bias need raising and it loses the picture. Turning off 10 minutes and the picture is back Questions for those, especially the Aussie guy, who have gotten one to work indefinitely: is there a brown rim around the shiny getters or are they all shiny? Have you experience of a tube acting like mine? Do you think that maybe it could be an electrical fault since the two tubes work or don't work identically? I have a similar appearing third tube that does not produce any picture at all. |
I have no idea about the gradual loss of picture (I have never played with one of these) except that you mentioned back bias lighting. Have you tried it? An LED flashlight, with its high blue content, might be good for a quick test.
Can you post a schematic of the first amplifier stage? |
1 Attachment(s)
here's that part of thttp://videokarma.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=194149&stc=1&d=1489275 183he schematic
|
Just on general principles of poking around, have you checked R114 and R126?
|
Quote:
bias voltages as it heats up. They do drift, but the key grid-cathode bias voltage does not, and all drift in sync and in small amounts. The bias in any case need far more adjustment than the drift. I tried checking drift of filament voltage while running by comparing the brightness and color of the tube in the camera to that of my dead 1846 running on 60 Hz and they are rock stable. I measured the heater voltage both by comparing the brightness to the other tube both on 60 Hz and the other one on 60 HZ and the camera one on 15750Hz, and also by measuring the camera tube voltage with a digital scope across the filament with the HV disabled, then calculating the RMS voltage from the scope trace (its sort of a square wave). I can't get the voltage up to 6.3 but is very close and does not drift enough to cause the problem. Of course, both tubes could be equally bad by chance. But its odd that of three tubes that have look-alike getters one does not work at all and two work sort-of, and the same. I've tried swapping 6AC7s around to no effect. |
Oh yes, a bit off topic ... the iconoscope I just bought came with "extras".
One was a mounting block for it to display it, into which I will put my bad one. Second was a copy of Pem Farnsworth's biography of Philo, autographed by her in 2004 (she died at age 98!). |
I'm running out of wild guesses. Slow onset and slow recovery seems like a thermal problem, but if the bias voltages aren't changing, what could it be?
What happens if you run it until the video disappears and then ground the collector ring with a clip lead/screwdriver? Could this be a bad ground connection charging up the second anode? |
I've tried grounding the collector ring with a screwdriver. I've also
tried putting + or - 9 volts on the unused pins which attach to the Cesium dispensers, and they don't do much if there is no hum on them. I've tried using a magnet to move the electron beam over to the side where it hits beyond the edge of the silver dot area. This generates a very strong signal which lasts a lot longer. Its currently cooling down so I'll try that again. It does seem thermal, but why cooling down much faster than warming up? Edit: a new try shows that the actual picture lasts much longer, at any setting of the bias, at the far left of the screen. |
Quote:
Do you have anyone who can review the wiring with a fresh eye in case something got missed when you recapped? |
I discovered by accident that even if it runs 5 minutes beyond the
picture disappearing, and I then turn off all power for 5 seconds and then back on again, as it re-warms up for a couple of seconds an excellent picture appears, just a bit small, lasting just an instant as it gets full size. This would seem to be a bias drift problem. I spoke to Schechter last night on the phone. Amazingly, he only knows of himself, McVoy, Aussie Bloke, the Japanese genius with the perfect transistorized picture, and me, with 1846 cameras working at all. Do you know of more? |
If my wild guesses are just annoying, tell me and and I'll shut up...
Is there more than one connection possible to the collector ring (like through the cesium depositors)? If so, can you try measuring voltage and/or grounding with a screwdriver? Can you pull the socket partly off and measure directly on the pins? |
Another thought is to float a VOM across the cathode and G1 so you can see any differential drift on a sensitive scale. (Just be careful to have it on an insulated surface and don't try to touch it while in operation!)
|
Quote:
That is, there are big blanking pulses on both cathode and grid. This means that the voltages measured on a voltmeter are not necessarily representative of what they are during the active scan time. I will retry this evening with the two blanking pulses disabled. And I will look at the two pulses with a scope and see if they drift. |
Add me to the list of working block camera owners!
I've had my CRV59 camera working for at least 15 years now and it seems to be about the same today as it was when rebuilt that long ago. I agree about it possibly needing the rear mosaic lamp. I've never had the picture fade out on me as you describe as the bias lamp(s) on this camera do work. (It's been a quite a while since I've opened the camera up so I've forgotten whether or not there's just one or two inside!)
I revamped the scans circuits to standard def sweep rates so I could use a regular broadcast monitor for viewing. No problems there. The camera power supply is solid state. |
Ralph, is yours a different camera from the ones I mentioned a couple of posts ago?
How long does yours take to stabilize from turn-on? My lamp does work. But old_tv_nut's suggestion did the trick, with my new angle. Removing the blanking pulses generated a "correct" grid bias of -20 to -22 volts. The picture faded when I adjusted the control, turned right on, to -26 volts. When the picture faded with the control all the way up the picture faded at .... -26 volts! I had not realized how much the blanking pulses caused a measurement problem. I will investigate the divider chain drift further, with all pulses sent to it disabled. If I can't figure out what's the problem and fix it, replacing a couple of resistors with Zeners should do the trick. That's unless the blanking pulses cause problems by drifting. Off to dinner. |
Same type of camera as yours
1 Attachment(s)
I checked on the camera and I can't find the original ID tag that was riveted on, but I did find what I think is RCA Camden's inspection tag; see pix attached. Interesting that they didn't call it a camera, rather a "Conversion Unit!"
The schematic I followed in my work is exactly the same as the excerpt you showed earlier, so we're both talking about the same model of camera. This camera is definitely not one of those you listed earlier. |
Fan added
One more thing: I added a square fan to the top via a replacement slide (instead of the tube access slide.) I did this after noticing how much heat there was inside the case when the original slide was in place. Considering how many tubes there are in such a small container, it might be helpful for longevity to do the same with yours even if it doesn't reduce the "blackouts" you've mentioned.
|
The problem is discovered and apparently fixed. I already had bought the
necessary parts. The key, and it was absolutely necessary, was to disconnect C134 and C107, the caps that send the vertical and horizontal blanking pulses to the grid-cathode circuit. This done, all the voltages measured with my 200MOhm probe made sense. C109 and especially C108, the oil HV filter caps, were leaking badly: C108 was at best (cold) 25 MOhm, worse when warm. I replaced them with 0.47 uF 1600V film caps. The voltage on the iconoscope went too high so I added a 1 MOhm 1 watt resistor in series with R125 (330K). The new caps are larger than the originals, so I mounted them on a terminal strip under the chassis. (They are polypropylene high reliability ones, and are very large.) Its now making better images, the problem being mainly horizontal streaking after bright or dark areas. Its quite stable. I will now check C116, C117, and C118, the other oil caps. Only C116 is critical: if leaky it would kill V104. Well, no, I looked at the schematic and it would just raise the cathode current. But I checked and its OK. And I'm now the owner of two good iconoscopes. |
I tried this gizmo the first time since I moved a year ago and it worked fine the first try.
Does anybody have a military or RCA manual for it? I need it for my collection. |
Can we get any updated pictures of it operating?
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
The format of this camera is currently 262 @ 60p Note that it is looking through a window screen. https://www.videokarma.org/attachmen...1&d=1748712652 https://www.videokarma.org/attachmen...1&d=1748712652 |
1 Attachment(s)
I put the camera outdoors on my patio and get a better picture, attached at higher resolution.
This is the very best it can do. I should add that while its a clear sky and sunny, the sky is white due to high altitude smoke from soviet canuckistan. Doug https://www.videokarma.org/attachmen...1&d=1748716523 |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.