View Full Version : Japanese Color TV set without a tricolor tube
yagosaga 05-27-2005, 03:50 PM Hi folks! In the mid 1960s, in Japan a cheaper color television set was available which contains three b/w crt's and a mirror system instead of a tricolor shadowmask tube. Who is able to give more informations about it? Did such a tv set survive until today and is it possible to display a picture of it in working condition?
Eric H 05-27-2005, 07:49 PM I've seen one, or one using the same system, on a site but I can't remember where.
frenchy 05-27-2005, 11:17 PM Hi folks! In the mid 1960s, in Japan a cheaper color television set was available which contains three b/w crt's and a mirror system instead of a tricolor shadowmask tube. Who is able to give more informations about it? Did such a tv set survive until today and is it possible to display a picture of it in working condition?
And we thought projection sets were particular about where the viewer sat. This set would have one hell of a small 'sweet spot'. Like watching tv thru a tunnel...
LBPete 05-28-2005, 01:09 AM That looks like a Mitsubishi logo on the front of the set under the picture tube.
- Pete
yagosaga 05-28-2005, 02:46 AM Sorry, I was wrong with the date. This color tv set was bought by Walter Bruch in 1955 at the airport of Tokyo. It is working with NTSC. Here is a look inside it. The drawings on the metal plate show the b/w screens. Above the vertical crt's there are two colored mirrors which reflect the picture to the front screen. The third horizontal crt at the top of the left side has a color filter too. It is a Mitsubishi tv set. Do there exist any sets like this today?
Sandy G 05-28-2005, 10:00 AM I still can't figure out why they went this route-looks like 3 CRTs, the mirrors/filters, additional circuitry, would have made it almost as expensive as sticking in a color CRT-even in 1955. And rotsa ruck aligning all that monkey-motion up & getting a decent picture...Still wouldn't mind having one for the historical/novelty value. -Sandy G
Pete Deksnis 05-28-2005, 11:07 AM Eyeball Observations:
The line cord and its plug (foreign-style to us on this side of the pond) provide a sense of overall size.
Three CRT’s, their magnetics, and the optics occupy three-quarters of the internal volume of the case.
Fact:
Even a ‘reduced tube’ CTC4 of 1955 had two dozen tubes.
Question:
Is this little guy also transistorized? four years before the Safari?
Was there a second electronics package that held the tube circuits?
?
yagosaga 05-28-2005, 11:33 AM On the ETF page
http://www.earlytelevision.org/color_prototypes.html
there is a triniscope prototype (RCA Triniscope #2, 1950) which looks very similar to that Mitsubishi tv set. Did somebody saw such a triniscope set ever working? They were developed in the early 1950s as an alternative to the very expensive tricolor kinescopes.
David Roper 05-28-2005, 12:35 PM They were developed in the early 1950s as an alternative to the very expensive tricolor kinescopes.No, the tricolor kinescope was developed soon after as there was no alternative. The earlier, massive trinescope was totally impractical on so many levels.
Steve D. 05-28-2005, 08:01 PM Just looking at the cabinet, logos, knobs ect. This set looks to be of a later design then 1955.
I also recall a previous post of this or a similar set some time back, but can't recall where.
-Steve D.
old_tv_nut 05-28-2005, 08:41 PM Mitsubishi showed a trinescope at the NY World's Fair, in the Japan pavilion. Even as a starving student, Iwas fascinated enough to spend two slides worth of film on it. There was also a demonstration of the dichroic mirrors, which I took a picture of, but now I don't know if that was in the Japan pavilion or maybe in the Hall of Science, which had some exhibits on color.
One advantage the trinescope had was that it was BRIGHT, and with that tunnel, you could watch it in daylight.
Look in my gallery for all 3 pix
heathkit tv 05-28-2005, 09:23 PM Does anyone else see the resemblance of the "nudie" photo to the typical home computer?
Anthony
John Folsom 05-28-2005, 10:44 PM That set must be mid 1960s, not 50s. I would think the CRTs are maybe 5"? And I expect it IS transistorized.
yagosaga 05-29-2005, 05:16 AM That set must be mid 1960s, not 50s. I would think the CRTs are maybe 5"? And I expect it IS transistorized.
I think you are correct. The pictures were taken from the book "PAL - Das Farbfernsehen" by Walter Bruch and Heide Riedel, p. 32. On page 33 was written:
"In der Zeit, als es noch keine Dreifarben-Bildroehre gab, also in der ganzen Entwicklungszeit fuer NTSC, musste man solche Empfaenger benutzen. Und auch dann noch, als die ersten Dreifarbenbildroehren noch knapp und teuer waren, verkaufte man solche Farbempfaenger fuer NTSC. Ein derartiges Geraet hat der Verfasser 1955 in Tokyo am Flugplatz gekauft."
Translation:
"In the time when no tricolor kinescopes exist, i.e. in the entire time of development of the NTSC system, one had to use such trinescope color receivers. And later in the time where the tricolor crts were rare and expensive, such trinescope color sets for NTSC were sold. One of these trinescope sets the author (i.e. Walter Buch) has bought in 1955 in Tokyo at the airport."
I think the time has to be 1965. "1955" had to be a type writer error. And 1965 lies within the range of time were Walter Bruch travelled all around the world to demonstrate his PAL color system.
bgadow 05-29-2005, 10:54 PM Fascinating. I find the old World's Fairs very interesting. So many new things to see...if we could all go back for a day.
Charlie 05-30-2005, 01:57 AM I think this particular set was discussed here on AK a couple years back. Not quite sure what to use in the search field to locate the thread.
old_tv_nut 05-30-2005, 11:29 AM If you want ot go back to the New York 64-65 fair, here are some links:
an absolutely huge site covering New York 64-65:
http://www.nywf64.com/
including my writeup and pix of the RCA exhibit
http://www.nywf64.com/rca01.shtml
a discussion forum covering mainly New York (64-65 and 1939), plus other fairs, with some of the most expert people on the subject:
http://www.peacethroughunderstanding.org/
frenchy 05-30-2005, 04:05 PM This is slightly off topic, but shows that color displays that use a B/W CRT are still around. This JVC professional monitor uses an LCD as sort of a solid state color wheel.
Hmm if you look at their 1st catalog for this set there, it shows the b/w monitor, then the 3 color filters stacked on top of it, with the 2 lcd shutters layered between the filters. I don't get how this works - the filters are all stacked so the light has to go thru ALL of them? How the heck do you just get red, or just blue? (with a wheel, it only has to go thru one color at a time). How do the shutters work, obviously they can't shut light off completely, or just the first shutter would result in no picture. Are the shutters divided into pixels, or is it just a solid pane shutter that goes from clear to black? Can anybody explain how this thing works? thanks...Frenchy
I remember seeing this set before as well. There was discussion on this, or a similar set, back in 2001 on the ARF site. The photos are gone now though. http://antiqueradios.com/forums/Forum6/HTML/000068.html
dewickt 05-30-2005, 07:15 PM Have seen many of the 3 LCD projectors (by Sharp) that use an LCD light valve for each color and prisms to combine the RGB to one beam. The light valve is dark untill a pixel or pixels are excited then it goes clear to let light thru. They use an arc lamp as the light source.
old_tv_nut 05-30-2005, 10:01 PM I suspect the 3 color filters are not plain red,green blue, but are polarized somehow - one LCD then switches transmissions between red and cyan, and the other between blue and yellow.
Red+yellow --> red
cyan+yellow--> green
cyan+blue--> blue
red+blue - not useful - black or nearly so
frenchy 05-31-2005, 01:36 AM I suspect the 3 color filters are not plain red,green blue, but are polarized somehow - one LCD then switches transmissions between red and cyan, and the other between blue and yellow.
Red+yellow --> red
cyan+yellow--> green
cyan+blue--> blue
red+blue - not useful - black or nearly so
But how can you get only cyan+yellow, if red is inline with the other two filters? Dito on the other combinations. Their graphic shows all three filters stacked on top one another in front of the crt face.
old_tv_nut 05-31-2005, 11:12 AM You are correct that if there are stacked filter sheets that always look red, green, and blue, then no light can be transmitted! So, obviously, the drawing and explanation must be confused and misleading. You can find an example of the kind of LCD shutters I described here:
http://www.colorlink.com/tecpage/tecpage.html
different possible arrangements:
http://www.colorlink.com/tecpage/pdfs/sid00colorswitch.pdf
complementary color version I described:
http://www.colorlink.com/tecpage/pdfs/sid00colorquad.pdf
more:
http://www.colorlink.com/tecpage/pdfs/pw97.pdf
what I described:
http://www.colorlink.com/tecpage/pdfs/pw96.pdf
frenchy 05-31-2005, 11:59 PM The last tech paper in your list has a graphic that looks similar to theirs, two shutters sandwiched between color layers.... sort of.
trinescope 06-08-2005, 01:48 PM I'm the one who posted about this set a few years back here and on antiqueradios.com. I still have it and it is in working condition, but is missing the knobs, the two woodgrain escutcheons, and the red Mitsubishi light-up logo below the channel selector knob. The picture shown at the top of the thread is a smaller version of the set I have; I guess the "viewing window" was widened a bit soone could view the set slightly off axis. This set uses series-string vacuum tubes; the chassis sits vertically on the right-hand side. The three CRTs have red, green, and blue phosphors; no color filters are used. Like someone just said, it produces a bright picture, and I'll add to that a Technicolor-like vividness to the color. The downside is the small (5-6") picture; but Mitsubishi provided a plastic Fresnel lens to mount in front of the window as a magnifier. The set appears to have been made in 1964 since many parts in the set have a 1964 date code. I doubt these were ever sold in the US in great number as the tricolor CRTs had already existed for years, and the trinescope, at least to me, appears to be a bit Rube Goldberg-ish in comparison.
old_tv_nut 04-06-2007, 02:01 PM I just picked up the flyer handed out at the NYWF for the Mitsu trinescope.
jedo1507r 04-06-2007, 02:44 PM Dang! Interesting set, but it does - in a way look like a furnace.
Pete Deksnis 04-06-2007, 04:42 PM No color killer?
21-MHz IF!
pulse-width AFC.
I want one.
John Folsom 04-06-2007, 05:29 PM Trinescope, could you post photos of the set? Wayne, thanks for posting the flyer for the set. Would I ever love to find one of those!
Hey Trinescope, if you are coming to the ETF convention, you should bring it along, I know we would all love to see it.
Thanks all!
dtuomi 04-06-2007, 08:10 PM That's a really neat set.
David
trinescope 04-09-2007, 09:42 AM I'll see if I can get a few pictures of the set up later on this evening.
trinescope 04-09-2007, 08:44 PM Here are a few pictures of the set in question. I was just fooling around with video from my computer fed into an RF modulator for the screen shots.
old_tv_nut 04-09-2007, 09:27 PM Super! What adjustments are there for convergence/registration? Electrical? Mechanical? Both?
Dave A 04-09-2007, 09:35 PM It looks like viewing a Philco Safari 2" set. Small tube(s) buried deep and looking large when viewed up close. Gotta have one.
Dave A
LBPete 04-09-2007, 09:41 PM A very cool set but it looks like a microwave sitting on a window air conditioner.
- Pete
trinescope 04-09-2007, 10:48 PM Convergence is both electrical and mechanical. The blue CRT is the reference; there are individual height, width, centering, and linearity adjustments for red and green. Also, there are magnets on the red and green CRTs for fine adjusting on the sides and corners. The set does display a bright picture like the brochure says, but is really finicky with convergence. Convergence changes with viewing angle to some degree. The circuits drift quite a bit, especially the tuner, but that might be due to age (this set has only had a few capacitors replaced in the vertical section so far).
wajobu 04-09-2007, 10:51 PM VERY cool link to the RCA Triniscope!
John Folsom 04-09-2007, 11:40 PM Eric,
Thanks so much for posting the photos. That is a VERY cool TV. I agree with Dave A....I gotta have one!
dr.ido 04-10-2007, 02:01 AM It seems Mitsubishi recycled this idea for a portable set. I was flicking through an old issue (79 or 80 from memory) of Electronics Australia the other night and found an atricle on new portable sets coming out of Japan. One of the sets used 3 small CRTs projected onto a screen that could be flipped down when the set was transported. They claimed this made smaller and it used less power than if they had used a single CRT the same size as the flip up screen. The article didn't mention if it was in production of just a prototype.
I've got my scanner working again, so I'll see if I can find the article again.
Dave A 04-10-2007, 11:33 AM Here it is in Japanese on a website there. Not the Mitsubishi site though.
http://sts.kahaku.go.jp/sts/detail.php?&key=100210021645&APage=79
Here is the google translation of the page.
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://sts.kahaku.go.jp/sts/detail.php%3F%26key%3D100210021645%26APage%3D79&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3D6ct-338%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN
And just for fun check this...a Mitsubishi rectangular color CRT from 1960;
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://sts.kahaku.go.jp/sts/detail.php%3Fid%3D9009%26key%3D100210021646%26APag e%3D7&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3D430ab22%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG
I hope all these long address strings work.
Dave A
Here are some pictures of Mitsubishi 6CT-333.
:thmbsp:
46671466724667346674
RCAkid 04-13-2007, 01:07 PM These sets are really cool.
It is quite interesting to look at the differences in styling from US sets to the sets from Japan.
The Japanese sets seemed much more utilitarian while the American sets were much more ornate and focused much more on the asthetic. It really shows the differences in culture. Just from the designs, it seems that the Japanese viewed these sets as much more of a kitchen appliance; while the Americans wanted much more ornate cabinetry and tended to treat the tv's they were in love with as a piece of furniture and a focal point of the home.
Quite fascinating. Of course now, the tv IS just another appliance or at least that's how it seems.:D
Bill R 04-13-2007, 06:38 PM These sets are really cool.
It is quite interesting to look at the differences in styling from US sets to the sets from Japan.
The Japanese sets seemed much more utilitarian while the American sets were much more ornate and focused much more on the asthetic. It really shows the differences in culture. Just from the designs, it seems that the Japanese viewed these sets as much more of a kitchen appliance; while the Americans wanted much more ornate cabinetry and tended to treat the tv's they were in love with as a piece of furniture and a focal point of the home.
Quite fascinating. Of course now, the tv IS just another appliance or at least that's how it seems.:D
I wonder if the styling changes are related to the fact that all the sets are no longer made in the USA.
Bill R
Dave A 04-14-2007, 01:17 AM Ita, is the set in your photos an earlier production model or a prototype? It looks to have a metal cabinet and some much simpler trim than the other photos and the Worlds Fair picture. And it looks like it is on wheels and has the more square screen than in the photos from Triniscope.
Were many of these ever sold in Japan?
Dave A
Einar72 04-14-2007, 10:41 PM It is quite interesting to look at the differences in styling from US sets to the sets from Japan.
The Japanese sets seemed much more utilitarian while the American sets were much more ornate and focused much more on the aesthetic. It really shows the differences in culture. Just from the designs, it seems that the Japanese viewed these sets as much more of a kitchen appliance; while the Americans wanted much more ornate cabinetry and tended to treat the tv's they were in love with as a piece of furniture and a focal point of the home.
It's hard for us in the U.S., especially those not born before 1970, to visualize that the typical postwar Japanese lifestyle (and resultant utilitarian approach) was much different than ours. It would be equivalent to the Southern States circa 1870 or so. The place was in ruins, the average family had a meager income, and the typical Japanese home was small compared to our spacious lifestyle. I still remember seeing a film about life in contemporary Japan as a school kid. The housewife would actually keep a piece of cloth over the modest TV as if it were an heirloom. The televisions produced back then, as well as the radios, were simple out of necessity. It was the economic necessity of adapting those products to American tastes that made them look more typical later on.
Compare that to the advertising for television in the 1940's and early 1950's. Men wore dapper suits, ladies wore evening gowns, it was a formal gathering for TV night! TV was, at first, truly a trophy for the affluent person, in a richly-appointed cabinet, often making up a sizable part of the cost!
Carmine 04-14-2007, 11:15 PM I would agree with the above, but I also think there is a big culture gap between eastern/western thinking... If that set were built in Germany, it would have had a nice cabinet. The English weren't exactly rollin' in dough after WWII either, but they still had some style in their manufactured goods.
I don't know if Australia was effected much one way or the other by WWII, but their products look the most "American" of anything other than the real-deal.
This communual "global" sell-in-every-nation crap makes for some pretty boring stuff.
|
|