Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early Color Television

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2017, 05:27 PM
old_tv_nut's Avatar
old_tv_nut old_tv_nut is offline
See yourself on Color TV!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rancho Sahuarita
Posts: 4,277
Cliff Benham, stop it already!

November 15, 1950 (Chicago) - Three-judge court headed by J. Earl Major, Chief Justice of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, issues temporary injunction restraining start of CBS color TV.

Do you think there might have been some court-shopping on the part of RCA?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg injunction stops CBS color 01.jpg (61.1 KB, 51 views)
File Type: jpg injunction stops CBS color 02.jpg (34.2 KB, 47 views)
__________________
www.bretl.com
Old TV literature, New York World's Fair, and other miscellany
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2017, 05:00 PM
wa2ise's Avatar
wa2ise wa2ise is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,092
Of course, every big corporation would do it...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2017, 09:49 PM
zeno zeno is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,782
As you know RCA was once a huge & powerful corp. They
were famous for suing the crap out of any competition. Also
I have met several old RCA engineers that HATED them
because they invented things & got zero credit. The contract
stated all inventions were property of RCA BUT even the slightest
credit was not given. Others years after leaving RCA were sued
because they claimed they invented things while on RCA's time.
As far as CBS goes it may have been OK for a few years but
NTSC color was better & served us well for over 60 yrs........

73 Zeno
LFOD !
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2017, 11:11 PM
cbenham's Avatar
cbenham cbenham is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 468
NTSC was the best compromise of all the world's television systms. However, it had a few drawbacks that linger till today. The choice of 3.579545 Mhz for the color subcarrier
still causes work arounds being sought in the conversion of NTSC programs to PAL and the various SECAM standards, not to mention all the modern digital standards because of the vertical frequency being 1000/1001. This leads to the need for "Drop Frame Time Code" to keep things in sync. The 1000/1001 choice was made to protect a few hundred thousand B&W non-intercarrier TV sets from the early 1950s which showed moire in the pictures when displaying the original choice of color which used 3.583125 as the color subcarrier frequency. Finally, if David Sarnoff had gone immediately to a non-compatible [with NTSC 525-60] color system, we would have had color much earlier. It took until 1970 for color to really catch on and become popular. That only happened because of the 12 inch Sony 12 inch Trinitron TV. THAT'S MY STORY and I'M STICKING TO IT!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-13-2017, 02:24 AM
Jon A.'s Avatar
Jon A. Jon A. is offline
Bullies beware.
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeno View Post
As you know RCA was once a huge & powerful corp. They
were famous for suing the crap out of any competition. Also
I have met several old RCA engineers that HATED them
because they invented things & got zero credit. The contract
stated all inventions were property of RCA BUT even the slightest
credit was not given. Others years after leaving RCA were sued
because they claimed they invented things while on RCA's time.
As far as CBS goes it may have been OK for a few years but
NTSC color was better & served us well for over 60 yrs........

73 Zeno
LFOD !
Unfortunately that's how most adults settle their differences, all the while telling their kids to play nice and share. I guess that's where the phrase "Do as I say, not as I do" came from.

I doubt I'll ever own another RCA set except if I intend to mine it for parts. Not only is it a lack of interest on my part, to me they're a reminder of Sarnoff's extreme greed.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 05-13-2017, 03:29 AM
Titan1a Titan1a is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Plattsmouth, NE 68048
Posts: 348
I have a five inch color portable that's RCA in name only. RCA, through Sarnoff, wanted television bad and did all he could to shaft Farnsworth and Armstrong. The real stinker is the US Government established RCA! This collusion with the feds not only set television back for years but stymied development with both AM and FM radio. The more I read the history of communications, the more I despise RCA, GE and Westinghouse who were all in this together. None of these exist in consumer electronics, thank God! Philco and Zenith existed in spite of them.
__________________
Rick (Sparks) Ethridge
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-13-2017, 01:34 PM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeno View Post
The contract stated all inventions were property of RCA BUT even the slightest credit was not given.
That's a very common contract provision in companies that do research & development of new technology. When you take such a job, you agree that everything that you invent in that area becomes the property of the company. Otherwise, you might covertly patent your best ideas and sell them to the competition -- or hold them for ransom unless your employer pays a big bonus for your "private" inventions.

I didn't work for RCA, so I don't know whether some people were overlooked, but you can find plenty of articles like the following one from RCA Review, where the author (an RCA engineer) credits various RCA engineers in a note at the end:

http://antiqueradio.org/art/RCACT-100TunerArticle.pdf

Phil Nelson
Phil's Old Radios
http://antiqueradio.org/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-14-2017, 03:31 AM
Findm-Keepm's Avatar
Findm-Keepm Findm-Keepm is offline
Followin' the Rules...
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeno View Post
....Also
I have met several old RCA engineers that HATED them
because they invented things & got zero credit. The contract
stated all inventions were property of RCA BUT even the slightest
credit was not given. Others years after leaving RCA were sued
because they claimed they invented things while on RCA's time......

73 Zeno
LFOD !
ALL RCA patents have an inventors name or names, with RCA as the assignee. This is the same for any 20th-century company that did R&D.

Your beloved Zenith did the same - as did Rauland. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/res...&search=Search

Most companies also had agreements with employees limiting their employability after they left the company, to avoid collusion on any un-patented ideas or products. This was over and above the "non-compete" clause in the contract.

Interestingly, most NASA patents are assigned to both NASA and the NASA director at the time of the patent.
__________________
Brian
USN RET (Avionics / Cal)
CET- Consumer Repair and Avionics ('88)
"Capacitor Cosmetologist since '79"

When fuses go to work, they quit!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-15-2017, 08:19 PM
wa2ise's Avatar
wa2ise wa2ise is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Findm-Keepm View Post
ALL RCA patents have an inventors name or names, with RCA as the assignee. This is the same for any 20th-century company that did R&D.

Most companies also had agreements with employees limiting their employability after they left the company, to avoid collusion on any un-patented ideas or products.
I got several patents at RCA, and RCA pwned them, though I still had bragging rights. See them at http://pw2.netcom.com/~wa2ise/radios/patents.htm The 11 older ones are RCA's. Looks good on a resume. The latest 2 are Zoran's.

As for "collusion on any un-patented ideas or products" I got laid off, which implies that they don't think I have anything they value anymore. So F 'em...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-15-2017, 08:51 PM
old_tv_nut's Avatar
old_tv_nut old_tv_nut is offline
See yourself on Color TV!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rancho Sahuarita
Posts: 4,277
You prompted me to go looking for my patents - thought I had a complete list, but I don't.

Try searching for your patents by inventor name on Google - also comes up with some other patents that reference yours - interesting. Seems there were as many improving on mine or working their way around them, as there were originals.
__________________
www.bretl.com
Old TV literature, New York World's Fair, and other miscellany
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ęCopyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.