#1
|
|||
|
|||
Great Deal on a new UHDTV !!
Hey all;
With all the recent hype about UHDTV, I thought this eBay ad might be of interest. Look at the super cheap shipping price too!! http://www.ebay.com/itm/OEM-Genuine-...item19ed35bed3 I'm ready to move to this next generation Don't let this one get "away"...... Tom (PK) Last edited by powerking; 05-25-2014 at 07:33 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
DID ANY new consumer tv EVER cost this much legitimately ??
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
And I would think a "UHDTV" would be 4K res.--NOT 2160...
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Check out the reviews of the smaller model on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN85S9...=samsung+4k+tv
not affiliated, jr |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Providing "tracking number" for FREE to all customers. o_O
|
Audiokarma |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
IIRC the CT-100 was 5,000$ in 1954 when the average car cost about 2,000$, and that UHD set is 40,000 when and average cost of a car last year was about 30,000$. If you look at the cost to be on the cutting(bleeding?) edge of television over the years in terms of how many new cars you could have bought instead (2.5 in '54 vs. 1.3 today) then we are saving about half the cars that we would have to give up to get the TV 60 years ago...
__________________
Tom C. Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off! What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I believe you are WRONG about this. Somone here may know for sure--but I THINK the CT-100 was about ONE thousand--1250 in 1954. NOT FIVE thousand.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
That is why there is an IIRC (short for If I Recall Correctly) in front of that that price....
It's been a few years since I last saw the original price quoted.
__________________
Tom C. Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off! What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
The sad part is, many will be stupid enough to actually buy these.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
amazon reviews are a hoot...
|
Audiokarma |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
2160p is the vertical resolution of "4K" or "UHD" displays. The horizontal resolution is 3840, which is rounded to get the "4K" number. Both resolution numbers are exactly twice the resolution of a 1080p "Full HD" display.
__________________
Chris Quote from another forum: "(Antique TV collecting) always seemed to me to be a fringe hobby that only weirdos did." |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Geez, I ought to just sell my Canon digital camera with "Full HD" video and wi-fi for what I can get for it while that model is still being sold new. Someone else is giving me a camera that shoots in standard def, all I'll ever want.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Panasonic has a 152 inch plasma that sells for $100,000. They had it at one of the CEDIA shows. They provided the installation and if my memory is correct, it needs 3 phase electricity to operate. It was 2200P if memory isn't too cloudy.
Last edited by Zenith26kc20; 05-28-2014 at 01:15 PM. Reason: corrected amount |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I have one of those Seiki 4k sets, 55" paid like $600 for it. Nice TV, not much content unless you hook it up to a computer. My viewing distance is about 9 feet, you can notice the smaller pixels at that distance if your vision is good enough.
__________________
-Give me Fisher or give me Death- yrly -If it's free, it's for me! - yrly -when you lose track of the receiver count you know you've got too many |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Oh, Prunella... I want/need at least 5 of 'em, wonder what kinda Deal would he make me ?!? Lessee now.. One for the Living Room, one for my Office, one in the Bedroom, one in the Ship's Radio Room, one in the Chithouse, maybe one in the Kitchen...Of course, the Junky Old Porthole Zenith, & that fugly l'il 621 will HAVE TO GO...(grin)
__________________
Benevolent Despot |
Audiokarma |
|
|