Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > The Amateur Radio Spot

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-09-2010, 06:06 PM
RitchieMars's Avatar
RitchieMars RitchieMars is offline
VK Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fountain Inn, South Carolina
Posts: 244
National SW-54

Many years ago, a friend of the family gave my mom this National SW-54.



At the time, my parents were really into CB radio and our friend, who had served in the air force, had quite a collection of equipment. He said this one didn't work and said that she could have it. Oddly enough, it ended up sitting in the floor somewhere or another. One day, my mom's foot collided with it and she was bent on chunking it out the front door so I convinced her let me have it, instead. I didn't want to see it get thrown away, and while I didn't know anything about it, I knew it was old and that was enough to give it value in my eyes.

It's sat on a shelf for several years now, and I've never really thought much about it. Awhile back, someone over at AudioKarma was talking about ham radios and whatnot and I mentioned having this radio and he told me it was a decent entry-level receiver. I looked into it, and sure enough, it was a popular model from the 1950's. It heavy, tube-type, and made during the 50's. That qualifies it as "cool."

Since I've been tinkering with vintage electronics lately ( restoring that Zenith television ) I figured I might have a look at it, now that I somewhat know what I'm doing. It was pretty much filthy inside.



It's safe to say that this thing hasn't been serviced in a very long time. Believe it or not, there's a copper-plated chassis under all of that dust.



Despite the copper plating, some pitting has set in. Naval jelly seems to be helping, though. This radio is unique in that the underside of the chassis can be accessed by removing the bottom cover, rather than having to remove the chassis completely. I took it all apart anyways, of course. It's a bit of a mess under there, too. No wonder it didn't work...



All of the original wax capacitors are still present and are long overdue for replacement. There seems to be a crude electrolytic repair where at least one 60MFD from the old can has been left in circuit while a metal multi-section can has been added.



Well no wonder this electrolytic didn't work! It was actually a banana in disguise!

Seriously though, WTF?

So, from what I can see, this should be pretty restorable. Phil has an article about this same model of radio on his site and from the looks of it, it shouldn't be too difficult to work on. I don't know too much about this genre of the radio hobby, but if I means I could listen in on some interesting transmissions, I'd be game for giving it a try. The radio would be of much more value restored than it would be in it's current condition, anyways. Best of all, it was free!

Last edited by RitchieMars; 10-09-2010 at 06:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2010, 06:32 PM
Sandy G's Avatar
Sandy G Sandy G is offline
Spiteful Old Cuss
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rogersville, Tennessee
Posts: 9,571
They were made from 1951-57, & were the competitors to Hallicrafters S-38 series. Both of 'em were "Boys' 1st Shortwave" radios, basically glorified AA5s. However, a lot of young people got their starts in SWL/ham radio w/modest sets like these little guys.
__________________
Benevolent Despot
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2010, 06:44 PM
RitchieMars's Avatar
RitchieMars RitchieMars is offline
VK Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fountain Inn, South Carolina
Posts: 244
Yeah, that was my first thought when I took the back cover off. The layout looked just like a typical AA5, hot chassis and everything.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2010, 01:30 PM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
Those are cute little buggers and they work just fine, as long as you understand what they are and don't expect miracles.

If the cabinet has some rust on the outside, Naval Jelly might work. I have used that to treat rust on painted things without harming the paint. There may still be a little gray dot or depression where the rust spot was, but you won't notice that with a hammered gray finish. Follow the directions on the label and try it on an inconspicuous spot before putting it all over the cabinet.

Phil Nelson
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2010, 07:38 PM
RitchieMars's Avatar
RitchieMars RitchieMars is offline
VK Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fountain Inn, South Carolina
Posts: 244
It's funny you mention that, because after reading about the SW-54 you restored on your site, I had already taken your tip about the naval jelly and put it to use. I think I finished it up Saturday night after a few treatments of naval jelly and then giving it a good wax job. Because of the gunmetal color, the bare spots where the rust ate through are hardly noticeable. It looked even better after I cleaned the crud out of the knobs.



I'll be finishing up my Zenith before I get started recapping this, but it looks like it'll be worth it. Thanks Phil!
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 10-12-2010, 11:51 AM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
Hey, that's looking good.

Phil
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2010, 06:24 AM
Sandy G's Avatar
Sandy G Sandy G is offline
Spiteful Old Cuss
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rogersville, Tennessee
Posts: 9,571
Yeah, trying to repaint in "Hammertone" is almost impossible. At least, I've never been able to.....
__________________
Benevolent Despot
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-27-2010, 02:25 PM
electroking's Avatar
electroking electroking is offline
a- v- karma member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal (QC), Canada
Posts: 743
I'm not sure it's a good idea to have the filter capacitor case (- terminal) in direct
contact with the chassis in this AC-DC design. Better check the schematic.

By the way, with all due respect to this little machine, I believe this thread
is closer to 'antique radio' than 'ham radio'...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-27-2010, 04:56 PM
Sandy G's Avatar
Sandy G Sandy G is offline
Spiteful Old Cuss
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rogersville, Tennessee
Posts: 9,571
Yeah, but that could prolly be said w/MOST of the 'Ham' stuff we talk about in here...It's ALL good...
__________________
Benevolent Despot
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-28-2010, 09:04 AM
dieseljeep dieseljeep is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,562
On side of the line is tied to the chassis, so it doesn't make any difference if the can is contacting the chassis. That set is U/L approved. Chassis is inulated from the case. I personally never like that bandspread arrangement.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #11  
Old 10-28-2010, 04:07 PM
electroking's Avatar
electroking electroking is offline
a- v- karma member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal (QC), Canada
Posts: 743
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieseljeep View Post
On side of the line is tied to the chassis, so it doesn't make any difference if the can is contacting the chassis. That set is U/L approved. Chassis is inulated from the case. I personally never like that bandspread arrangement.
I'm not so sure of that: when one side of the line is connected to the
chassis, often the return point of the power supply (= can of the
electrolytic capacitor) is insulated from the chassis by a tubular
capacitor. That's what I meant.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-31-2010, 02:18 AM
RitchieMars's Avatar
RitchieMars RitchieMars is offline
VK Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fountain Inn, South Carolina
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by electroking View Post
I'm not sure it's a good idea to have the filter capacitor case (- terminal) in direct
contact with the chassis in this AC-DC design. Better check the schematic.

By the way, with all due respect to this little machine, I believe this thread
is closer to 'antique radio' than 'ham radio'...
I didn't pay much mind to the electrolytic can. I don't think I'll even bother with it since I'll probably be replacing all of the questionable wax and electrolytic capacitors anyways. Until I get around to doing that, I don't see much need to try and power it up. It doesn't have a power cord, anyhow.

Actually, I had considered posting this in the antique radio section because of it's AA5 design. But, since it's a communications receiver, I thought it might be more interesting to hear from folks who might have seen or used one of these before. That and I figured that tinkering with this thing might introduce me to a part of the radio hobby that I haven't explored as of yet.

In any case, I had it for years and I was just tired of it sitting around looking miserable.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-01-2010, 10:03 PM
RitchieMars's Avatar
RitchieMars RitchieMars is offline
VK Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fountain Inn, South Carolina
Posts: 244
I found this guy on YouTube who's restoring a SW-54. He's got some pretty good information to refer back to when I get around to fixing up mine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo__b...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-01-2010, 10:34 PM
Sandy G's Avatar
Sandy G Sandy G is offline
Spiteful Old Cuss
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rogersville, Tennessee
Posts: 9,571
Seems like I remember the crew at "Monitoring Times" restoring an SW-54 several years back...They had it spread out over a period of several months' worth of articles..The next one you oughta shoot for would be an NC-98 or even an NC-125...National's "Cadillac" was the HRO series, but they are very anachronistic, having separate coils that you have to change out. Their REAL TOTL-at least more practical- receiver was the NC-183D, which was referred to as "The Bandswitching HRO".
__________________
Benevolent Despot
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-15-2010, 01:03 PM
bob91343 bob91343 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 745
I liked the NC-183 because it had two rf stages, something very few radios had. I never looked closely at the NC-183D. I suspect the frequency stability wasn't exceptional, and certainly the bandspread calibration wasn't fine enough for me. At least, not with Collins having 1 kc per division, and accurate too. By today's standards, even Collins' calibration could be considered a bit sloppy.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.