Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Recorded Video

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2014, 07:00 PM
Telecolor 3007's Avatar
Telecolor 3007 Telecolor 3007 is offline
I love old stuff
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 2,081
Exclamation Some historical curiosites about audio cassette recording

I'm curios:
1) When the 1st stereo compact cassette was released on the market?;
2) When the qualty of the sound started to improve?;
3) Why the ferro-chromium tapes didn't caught on the market?

How did the late '70's cassette deck looked like?
__________________
OLD, but ORIGINAL, not Made in CHINA.
Sailor Moon

Last edited by Telecolor 3007; 01-05-2014 at 07:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2014, 07:18 PM
Electronic M's Avatar
Electronic M Electronic M is offline
M is for Memory
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pewaukee/Delafield Wi
Posts: 14,798
The 'Norelco Cassette' as it is formally known was first sold in 1964 as a voice/dictation format, and did not become a 'HiFi' format until the early 1970's IIRC.
I don't know about #3.
__________________
Tom C.

Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off!
What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2014, 01:22 PM
Phototone Phototone is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 89
It was the application of Ray Dolby's Noise Reduction system to compact cassettes that made them into a HiFi medium. This (as I recall) involved the use of chromium tapes as well as his unique circuitry. One of the first home decks to feature Dolby processing was the deck made by KLH. It was made in USA and utilized a Wollensak transport. This was the early to mid 1970's.

Ferro-Chrome tape was a type that was supposed to give the superior noise free results of Chrome tape yet not require as high a bias voltage. As I recall it suffered from higher distortion. I also recall it being said that Chrome and Ferro-Chrome tapes caused more head wear than conventional tapes, but I think tape head technology advanced enough to compensate for this.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2014, 09:09 PM
ChrisW6ATV's Avatar
ChrisW6ATV ChrisW6ATV is offline
Another CT-100 lives!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hayward, Cal. USA
Posts: 3,472
As Phototone said, chromium dioxide (CrO2) tapes caused more wear on heads than regular (iron oxide) tapes. Later, high-performance tapes were developed that sounded equal to or better than CrO2 but were actually variations of iron oxide if I remember right. They were matched to the chromium dioxide bias and equalization settings of tape decks, though. TDK's SA and Maxell's UDXL were the early, popular tapes of this kind.

Later, the tape industry started using the designators "Type I" through "Type IV" for the different bias settings since not all "chrome bias" (Type II) tapes were actually CrO2 as mentioned above.

I have attached a picture of the first stereo tape deck model I bought new, a Superscope CD-304 in 1978.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Superscope CD-304.JPG (11.0 KB, 11 views)
__________________
Chris

Quote from another forum: "(Antique TV collecting) always seemed to me to be a fringe hobby that only weirdos did."
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.