#1
|
|||
|
|||
TV set interference issues, in BBC land...
Here's a BBC story regarding TV-set-generated interference taking revenge on the new wireless upstart.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-54239180 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
You can swing that two ways:
-Older electronics are electrically less clean than modern electronics when it comes to (presumably) forcing noise back upstream on the AC line or EMI shielding. -Modern electronics (and supposedly telecommunication equipment) are so cost reduced that they cannot handle abnormal line or environmental conditions. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Tom C. Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off! What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
This story was incomplete. The whole village is served by DSL, which is much more susceptible to interference than a broadband coax cable system.
Here's a more complete version: https://arstechnica.com/information-...for-18-months/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
TV set interference issues, in BBC land...
Quote:
That still isn't "the rest of the story." It's a crap explanation to say that DSL is more susceptible to interference. That mere fact alone doesn't mean anything. For starters we need to understand if it was conducted or radiated noise. Also, for all we know there might be some other intermediate object that was indirectly responsible for a perceived cause-and-effect relationship. As an aside, Ars Technica is as good of a source for accurate technical information as People Magazine is for hard-hitting investigative journalism. |
Audiokarma |
|
|