View Full Version : CTC-5 Strathmore!


Whirled One
03-03-2005, 08:43 PM
[I was going to post about this earlier this week, but I'm now finally getting around to it...]

This past Saturday, I was in Ohio to pick up the RCA CTC-5 "Strathmore" that Kinzbird was offering for sale here several weeks ago. I've got to say-- I'm just amazed at how beautiful this set really is! The cabinet is truly in superb condition, and is really just a darn nice looking console any way you look at it. Well, I think so, anyway. :banana: I've never seen a 50's color set in person outside of a museum, so what do I know... :)

These two pictures are ones I took right after a friend and I hauled it up to my apartment. [NOTES: In the "doors open" image, it looks like the volume/brightness knobs are missing, but that's because I had removed the chassis before transporting it, and the bracket holding those controls has to be removed in order to pull the chassis.]

I really like a lot of the little details on this cabinet, such as the round metal accents on the doors, the elaborate multi-layered mask and bezel around the picture tube, and the lettering ("C O L O R") painted in gold on the inside of the front glass.

Right now, I'm cleaning up the chassis a bit (it's pretty dusty!) and doing some preliminary tests, but hope to re-install the chassis in the cabinet this weekend and soft-start it to see where things really stand. The 6BK4 HV regulator has an open heater, though, so I'll have to dig another one up first.

Just as historical notes, here are some tidbits about this particular set provided by documentation and suggested by clues from inspection:

About half of the tubes are still original. Most of these have date codes of 56-48, but a few have 56-43 and one has a 56-39 code, thus suggesting this TV was built in December 1956 or early 1957.

The CRT is apparently also original, as it too has a 56-48 date code. Amazingly, it still tests good, with strong emission! [all three guns read in the low/mid 80's on the 0-100 scale on my B&K CRT tester.] Cool! That was a big relief. :yes:

All of the tubes, including replacements, are RCA brand. There is an old RCA service tag on the chassis dated 1972. Kinzbird's receipts suggest that it was indeed repaired exclusively by RCA service techs. I see a few "orange drops" in the vertical section, but the set otherwise appears to have seen rather few repairs in its day. Just when this set was taken out of everyday use is not known, but after the family bought a new TV, they simply unplugged this set and left it sitting in the corner of the living room-- where it remained until the day I picked it up..! It's certainly been cared for extremely well during its life.

After it was built, this TV must have sat in a warehouse or dealer showroom for quite some time before it was sold. The down-payment receipt is dated October 10, 1958, so it would have been one or two model years old at that point. This payment receipt suggests that the total price paid for the set was $574.32, which would certainly have represented a fair discount from its original list price in 1956. [I don't know what, if any, of that is sales tax or interest/carrying charges, or if there was a trade-in involved as well.] This follows reasonably from the information on Ed Reitan's web site that says that RCA did in fact continue to offer various "leftover" CTC-5 Deluxe consoles having full doors (like the Strathmore) well into the CTC-7 era. [I suppose sales of all CTC-5 sets were poorer than RCA expected, but I guess the top-of-the-line models were particularly sluggish sellers if RCA was still trying to sell off two-year-old inventory..!] Note: Does anyone here know what the original list price of a Strathmore was? In any case, it would appear that Kinzbird's Grandfather got a pretty nice deal in 1958..!

Anyway, I was just rather excited to get this set, and though I'd share some info and pics with the group. :-) Any further info (or corrections) about this particular model appreciated!

Sandy G
03-03-2005, 09:13 PM
I got just 3 words to say to you: (1) You, (2) Lucky, (3) Dog !!! GORGEOUS set !! You ever get sick 'n' tired of it, I'd LOVE to take it off yr hands !!-Sandy G.

bgadow
03-03-2005, 09:38 PM
I've got one of those "Radio & Television News" 1957 Color Television magazines & it lists the Strathmore at $795. So somebody got a good deal (and so did you!). Thats a handsome set, and with the doors closed its the kind you would walk past without guessing whats inside. From going through old Life magazines from that year, RCA was really pushing color tv hard. But I guess it was still a real hard sell. Anyway, welcome to the CTC-5 club-you are really going to enjoy it!

John Folsom
03-03-2005, 10:09 PM
Congratulations on a great acquisition! The CTC-5 is a great set, and a lot of fun to work on. Keep us posted on your progress.

Whirled One
03-04-2005, 07:20 PM
I've got one of those "Radio & Television News" 1957 Color Television magazines & it lists the Strathmore at $795. So somebody got a good deal (and so did you!). Thats a handsome set, and with the doors closed its the kind you would walk past without guessing whats inside. From going through old Life magazines from that year, RCA was really pushing color tv hard. But I guess it was still a real hard sell. Anyway, welcome to the CTC-5 club-you are really going to enjoy it!

Thanks bgadow! (and everyone else who has responed!) :) I've been wanting a 50's color set for a while, and it's pretty darn neat to finally have one, and such a nice example at that!

Anyway, I think your observation about the "mild-mannered" appearance of this set with the doors closed is actually rather important. I was thinking something very similar when I first saw it in its original location-- the wood used in this cabinet matched rather nicely with the wood paneling in the living room it was in, and (with the doors closed) probably made for a quite attractive table to hold a lamp and some framed photos in the corner of the room. If the set didn't match the other decor in the room or look so nice, it probably wouldn't have been kept around all this time. Sure, a Philco Predicta vertical "barber-pole" console looks pretty nifty today as a classic TV, but I wonder how many of those were tossed in the landfill because they started to look out of place against the new furniture that their original owners bought in the late 1960's and 70's..? Perhaps there's something to be said for "understated" cabinet styles after all.

Steve D.
03-06-2005, 01:05 AM
Very nice Strathmore there. Forum member Steve K. has that same model in the Bleached Birch finish.
RCA was still trying to clear their CTC-5 stock well after the CTC-7 & 9's were in production. Some local store ads here in Los Angeles still offered new CTC-5's for sale in 1959. These sets were sold at discounted prices with generous trade-ins for your old set. I've owned and seen many CTC-5 models over the years and note that some have the word/decal "COLOR" on the inside of the safety glass and some don't. I'm not sure when RCA made this change. The CTC-5 "Lockhaven" model had the word COLOR on the mask itself as did all CTC-7 & 9 models.


-Steve D.

Whirled One
03-06-2005, 10:40 AM
Update!

Well, I soft-started it yesterday afternoon, and when I ran it at normal voltage, and turned up the brightness far enough, I was greeted with a almost invisible and poorly focused raster with a brighter (but still dim) narrow shimmering vertical rainbow of color that appeared on the right-hand side of the CRT. The 'rainbow' only appeared when the brightness and contrast controls are advanced at least to their halfway points. The vertical and horizontal hold controls behave normally. The hue and color controls have no effect on the raster. There is no audio except for random static (which indicates at least the AF output stage is okay). Rotating the channel selector does produce some visual and audiable 'noise' as the switch contacts change, but that's it.

Well, at least it has a raster..! I let it run for a few minutes, and nothing seemed to get overly hot either, so that was a good sign. The flyback was still cool after I shut off the set. One thing that surprised me was how *quiet* the HV section was. Normally, I can hear the horizontal oscillator of TV sets (especially old ones) fairly well, but I didn't hear this one at all. Before I first swiched on the set, I set the brightness control almost all the way to its minimum, so I was really surprised to see anything on the screen when I turned up the brightness, since the lack of horiz oscillator whine made me figure the HV wasn't working.

One thing I quickly noticed was that the heater of the 1V2 focus rectifier wasn't lit. while the set was on, I pushed at it with a wooden stick just to see if it was a dirty connection, but that didn't do anything. The 1V2 gets its heater voltage from the flyback, but the 3A3 HV rect also does (though via a separate winding), and its heater was lit.

I saw only about 200V on the 300V B+ line (measuring it on the wiring harness that goes to the tuner), so I'm sure there's something fishy somewhere causing that. As I was still wondering about the dark 1V2, though, just for fun I replaced it with a new one (since I happened to have a few of those around) to make sure it wasn't something flaky in the old one (though it tested okay in a tube tester, and has a quite visible heater). The heater didn't light up with that one either, though the raster was now noticibly brighter for some reason, and now it produces a rather trippy pattern of colors whose colors change with the setting of the brightness and contrast controls. The focus is too poor to be able to dicern the individual scan lines, but if you turn the contrast control up enough, you can see what appear to be blurry retrace lines. The raster fills almost the entire screen even at low brightness, but blooms (and defocusses even further) if the brightness and contrast controls are advanced far enough. Note: I have not degaussed the tube or anything like that yet, so I'm sure the purity is going to be bad no matter what.

Questions: with B+ as low as it is, is it normal to even be able to get enough HV to see a visible raster on the screen, yet not have enough B+ for the IF stages to work? (I haven't measured the 380V B+ line yet, but I would suppose it is proportionately low) Of course, these could be two totally separate problems. Also, why would there be enough HV to get the HV rect tube to light up from its flyback winding, but not the focus rect? Hope it's not the flyback itself that's bad... One thing I noticed is that someone had jumpered a resistor connecting the focus rect to the CRT, so perhaps that's a clue about something. In any case, I would suppose my next step is to find out what the deal is that's causing the low B+.

Steve K
03-06-2005, 01:04 PM
Hi Whirled:

I am the guy who has the blond version of your set. Yes, check low voltage supply first. I would replace the electrolytics first. I know some don't takethat approach but I feel safer with new capacitors in there. Then make sure that your 5U4s are good. They could be weak causing low B+. If that doesn't bring it back up then start disconnecting individual lines going to the different circuits to find out where you are losing the B+.

Steve

Chad Hauris
03-06-2005, 01:16 PM
Are you sure the 1V2 might just appear too dim to see it...there isn't much filament power on such a low voltage filament type tube. Do you have another set using 1V2 that is a known good working set you can compare?

Steve K
03-06-2005, 01:20 PM
Chad is correct, you will not be able to see a 1V2 filament lit.

roundscreen
03-06-2005, 06:43 PM
Hi wirled one.
If your set had no focus voltage the crt would not light. There would be a blue glow in the neck. Like the other guys say, Go after all the caps. power supply first. Replace the 5u4s if u can. If focus problem is still there after u get b+ up and horz drive check ok then go after the focus control and that wire you were talking about.

Whirled One
03-07-2005, 10:47 PM
Okay, it looks like the low B+ was mostly a "test equipment malfunction". (Sorry!) Y'see, I figured rather than use my usual DMM, it might make more sense to monitor B+ with my big old analog VOM, since it's easy to see the meter pointer from a distance and easier to spot up/down drifting than on my DMM, plus I could just leave it connected and not have to worry about the meter shutting itself off after a few minutes of inactivity like my DMM. Plus, it has a 1000VDC range, and it's 50K ohms/volt so there shouldn't be any significant loading going on. Well, after pulling the chassis, propping it up on a table (running it on a variac, with HV and vertical output tubes pulled, but a speaker connected) and tracing B+ voltages back towards the 5U4's, I increasingly began to think something funny was going on... Even after pulling the main B+ fuse (which comes just after the 5U4's and before any of the filter caps) I still wasn't able to get more than about 200V on the meter, and it was just as erratic as before. On a whim, I disconnected the power again, switched to the 250V scale, ramped the power back up, and watched the meter pointer rise up-- to about mid-scale, and erratically. At this time I started to hear a scratching/hissing sound from the speaker. Gee, that's odd, the B+ fuse is pulled, how could there be any audio? Then I smelled something burning. Wait! That's not the *speaker* making that sound-- that's the multimeter!! :eek: One fried VOM, coming right up. Measuring B+ with my "everyday" DMM, everything was hunky-dory and stable.

However, running the chassis by itself turned out to have a side benefit. Rather than remove the tuner from the cabinet, I decided I'd make use of the old "Tuner-Subber" I had found at a hamfest a while back. With the substitute tuner hooked up to the IF input cable from the chassis, I was surprised to find I was now receiving TV program audio at the speaker-- all
I had been able to get before (with the chassis hooked up in the cabinet) was a little random static. As it turns out, there is indeed a problem with the tuner. I put the chassis back in the cabinet, and with the set's own tuner, it's just as before with a dull blank raster. However, with the substitute tuner, I actually get something that looks like a picture! The horizontal frequency is way off, though, and the focus is still very poor, and there's no apparent chroma signal, but at least it's *something*! At least that means the IF, video amp, and audio sections are okay. Even with a working accurate meter, B+ is actually a tad low, but not bad (I see about 280-290V on the 300V bus), so I doubt that's the main culprit of the focus/brightness issues, but it's something to keep an eye on. The 1V2 is still dark (the heater is quite visible when running it in a tube tester; yes, I know, a lot of 1-volt miniature tubes, such as those used in old portable radios, have almost invisible filaments, but the 1V2 was quite easy to see on the tester, so I figure it should be visible here...), and I measure near-zero VAC across the heater pins (though it's also possible that my DMM can't measure AC accurately at such high frequencies). The flyback winding that powers the 1V2 heater has continuity, and it's really easy to spot on the flyback (it's just a single loop of wire) for that matter. Clipping that dodgy-looking jumper wire had no evident effect. Next I'm going to see if I can find an extra damper tube and horiz output tube just to see if replacing them affects anything (I did see some blue flickering in the HO tube, but not really bad), adjust the horiz osc coil, and check other components in the HV/horiz section...

Thanks for all the comments/advice so far! Sorry 'bout the B+ red herring, though...

Steve K
03-07-2005, 11:39 PM
How far off is the horizontal frequency? If you have wide diagonal lines, set the horizontal control to mid range and adjust the horizontal frequency coil on the circuit board a bit to see if that will lock it in. If the frequency is far off then start by recapping the entire horizontal section. If it is not working correctly that can reduce all the high voltages. I assume that you tested/subbed all the tubes in those sections. There are several 10 meg or so resistors in the focus circuit that could increase in value so you will want to check those. Have you measured the high voltage and focus voltage? If you do not have a high voltage probe they are usually available on eBay,

Steve

nasadowsk
03-08-2005, 11:17 AM
Hey!!! Where's the chassis pics???

Hmm, I owe you guys some pics too now that my CTC-7 is running...

Whirled One
03-08-2005, 08:26 PM
'Nother update!

The tuner is working now. The original 6BQ7A RF amp tube had at some point been replaced with a 6BC8. The 6BC8 is listed as a substitute for the 6BQ7A in my old SAMS tube substitution guide, so that may have been OK. Replacing it with a new 6BQ7A brought the tuner back to life..! Reception is pretty weak, though. Just for good measure, I also replaced the 6X8 mixer/oscillator, but that didn't help much. Reception was also pretty weak with the "Tuner Subber" for that matter, so it's probably a so-so IF stage or something. Right now I'm just glad to see the tuner functioning!

I also saw another example of how outside factors can cause unexpected results. First, there was the bad VOM that made me persue what I thought were apparent B+ issues. Even afterwards, though, B+ seemed a bit low anyway. Well, now even *that* has been explained. Y'see, ever since the first time I started it up, I'd *always* been powering this chassis through a Variac, with the rationale being that I can reduce "inrush" current and avoid potential damage caused by switching it on/off while testing. [Plus, it was just convenient... :) ] Well-- one thing I hadn't considered was the fact that this is probably the highest-current-drawing device I've ever powered with this Variac-- this TV draws 380 Watts according to the statement on the back cover! So, I decided I'd measure the actual voltage output from the variac with my DMM. As it turns out, with that much load, the output from the Variac ran between 10% and 15% low. Turning up the variac until it matched "normal" AC line voltage here (~ 120 V) brought the B+ line right up to spec..!

Bringing up the AC input to its normal level also raised HV, but it's still very low. Steve asked if I had an HV meter probe. Actually, I do, but I kept forgetting to actually bring it out and measure the HV when the set was running... :-/ [Plus, I don't know about you all, but I get pretty skittish poking around a "live" HV section... at least the HV output on this set is readily accessible and easy to prod with an HV meter probe...] Anyway, so now I've measured HV. Before I realized how much voltage drop there was from the Variac, it ran at about 14 KV, but now it gets up to 15 or 16 KV (assuming this old HV meter is accurate, of course). It should be about 20 KV, so that's still quite low. Brightness and focus are still poor, although *way* better than it was at 14 KV. I've tried swaping all HV tubes except the horizontal output tube and the HV rectifier, but that's because I don't have any replacements for them. I'll be at a hamfest in a few weeks, though, so hopefully I can pick up at least a new HO tube. The 10 meg resistors in the focus circuit are okay. They read a bit high, but just within tolerance. The other focus resistors above the chassis seem okay too. When I pull the chassis again, I'll check the other components in the HV
section.

As it turns out, the horizontal frequency coil *is* the front panel horizontal hold control on this set. The "best" I can get is a picture with about 15-20 wrap-around "lines". There doesn't seem to be anything else to adjust that controls the oscillator frequency, so it looks like a little testing of the oscillator circuit (or just re-capping...) is in order. Swapping the oscillator tube had no discernable effect.

There's still apparently no chroma signal, and everything tends to be green, but I'm not worried about that just yet. :)

Thanks again to everyone for their help, and thanks for putting up with my long-winded posts..!

roundscreen
03-09-2005, 07:13 AM
Hi Wirled one.
The coil on the board is the sine coil. The control on the front of the set is the frequency coil. I took a look at my 1v2 and I can see the heater running.
ED

bgadow
03-09-2005, 02:28 PM
On mine I had lots of trouble with the video board-the tube socket to the front of the board crumbled & underneath, below the metal shield, there is a terminal strip which turned to crispy critters, killing the raster. Not that this has much to do with yours but worth sharing experiences. I had lots of horizontal trouble but it was nearly all caused by a ham-handed repairman. (guy hangs out in my mirror) I do know that the horiz. hold has a ton of travel in it.

Whirled One
03-13-2005, 08:13 PM
Okay, here's a slight puzzler. The horizontal oscillator frequency is still too low, and can't get it in range with the horiz osc coil. Attached is the relevant section of the schematic. As you can see, the osc frequency is primarily determined by L118 (the horiz. freq coil, which also doubles as the customer "Horiz. Hold" control) and C606. This capacitor is a mica cap, and tests fine in my old Heathkit capacitor tester (which can test for leakage at various voltages-- really a handy thing, by the way). I don't have very many replacement mica caps around, but it so happens that I actually had a new 330pF silver mica, so I swapped it in-- but that didn't help. I also tried tacking in a 270pF ceramic (one of the few other high-voltage caps I had in that general capacitance range but lower than 330pF) in place of the 330pF just as an experiment, and indeed it did help slightly, but not nearly enough to get it in range. I don't know the expected resistances or inductances for the horiz frequency coil, as they aren't listed in the RCA service manual I have, so I can't be absolutely sure there isn't something wrong with the coil. It seems like it's within reason, though. I measure 77 ohms between points H and K, and 55 ohms between points J and K. Anyone know the correct values for this coil? I don't have the SAMS folder for it, but it probably has those values listed.

Other things I tried: Swapping the 6CG7 tube had no discernable effect. R606 tested okay, and replacing it with R's of different values had no discernable effect either. C602, C603, R602, and R608 are all okay too.

Any thoughts? I suppose I could "force" it to work by either trying lower-capacitance replacements for C606, or by "padding out" the horiz. freq coil with another coil, but that seems a bit dodgy. Still, it's kinda annoying to be soooooo close to having a watchable picture, but being not *quite* there! :-!

On the other hand, I did stumble on the cause of my overly-green raster. At the back of the CTC-5 "Deluxe" chassis in the area where the chroma section lives, there's a riser board with a number of power resistors on it. Well, there was a cotton-covered connecting wire dressed in such a way that it was practically *wedged* between one of those power resistors and an adjacent tube. Seems that over time, this had scorched the wire, even severing the conductor-- it was so bad that the wire literally *crumbled* at that point when I touched it. Fixing the bad wire got me a much more 'color balanced' raster. BTW, attached is a recent screen image, which also
illustrates the horiz osc problem.

Thanks everyone!

Steve K
03-13-2005, 08:53 PM
Replace R608 with a new 100K anyway. That 330 mmf cap replacement should not be a ceramic. Resolder the connections on the entire circuit board as CTC-5s are weak in this regard (also check the ground connections). And as I stated earlier, slightly adjust the sine coil, this may pull it in. I had the same problem on a 5 some time ago and that fixed it.

yagosaga
03-14-2005, 12:43 AM
I had trouble with wrong voltages and currents in the horizontal unit too. Read

http://audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=30364&page=5

and the following postings. I have renewed all the resistors on the horizontal oscilltor board. Some of these old resistors are crumbly. After renewing I got the correct values. But be careful with soldering. I had a short between grid and screen of the 6CB5 with fatal consequences.
Check R603 too. In my manual it has 150K, not 100K like in yours. In the set I found 90K and changed it with 150K.
BTW: Is A.G.C. ok? The first anode of the 6U8 should have -30 thru -70 volts. (Without signal input 0 volts).

nasadowsk
03-14-2005, 11:55 AM
anyone got a whole '5 schematic they could post up here? i was always curious as to what they were like, both the cheapie super version and the better deluxe one....

old_tv_nut
03-15-2005, 12:55 PM
http://www.mcmlv.org/Archive/Radio/CTC4.pdf

http://www.mcmlv.org/Archive/Radio/CTC5A.pdf

roundscreen
03-15-2005, 06:27 PM
Hi Whirled one.
Go after c610 and c 611- 82 mmf. If they are original caps replace them. Even if they check good. replace them. You can put in 100 mmf caps in there. That should give you good results. Also it would be a good idea to get rid of all wax caps. At some point they will go bad. Looks like you do have a winner. good luck
ED

nasadowsk
03-15-2005, 08:46 PM
Interesting - the color section reminds me a bit of the later Zeniths with the beam switch tubes. I wonder if Zenith got the idea from the '5? Also note the cheapie burst wacking the 3.58mhz oscillator.

I guess RCA tried to cut corners a bit too much with the super. Interesting design though...

Hmmm, I wish for a CTC-5 schematic and it appears in .pdf the next day. I wonder if I wish to the schematic fairy for a CTC-7 schjematic, one will appear tomorrow here? :scratch2:

:D :D :D :D :D

roundscreen
03-16-2005, 07:25 AM
Schematic fairy! I needed a good laugh

old_tv_nut
03-16-2005, 09:31 AM
The schematic fairy has exhausted all known sources - try St. Clare (patron saint of television) :D

Whirled One
03-16-2005, 07:48 PM
I had trouble with wrong voltages and currents in the horizontal unit too. Read

http://audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=30364&page=5

and the following postings. I have renewed all the resistors on the horizontal oscilltor board. Some of these old resistors are crumbly. After renewing I got the correct values. But be careful with soldering. I had a short between grid and screen of the 6CB5 with fatal consequences.
Check R603 too. In my manual it has 150K, not 100K like in yours. In the set I found 90K and changed it with 150K.
BTW: Is A.G.C. ok? The first anode of the 6U8 should have -30 thru -70 volts. (Without signal input 0 volts).

Say, thanks for pointing all of that out-- I had earlier been following your saga with the CTC-5 Aldrich with interest, but had forgotten that you too had troubles in the horiz osciallator section. I had a few "crumbly" resistors too, though the PC boards appear to be in good shape. Right now, I'm still waiting for some new caps to arrive that I ordered, but should have them in a few days. [BTW, yes, I know that C606 should not be replaced with a ceramic; I only did that as a test to confirm that it would indeed raise the oscillator frequency. Ceramic caps are not stable enough for this sort of timing application...]

Since old_tv_nut posted the schematic for the CTC-5A (through 5H) chassis version (the "Special"/"Super" models), I may as well fill in with the scematic for the CTC-5N (through 5AB) chassis version (the "Deluxe" models) as found in my edition of the RCA manual. Note that the tuner schematic is not included in this diagram.

oldtvman
03-20-2005, 04:44 PM
other than the usual maintainence required the ctc 5 produces an excellent picture

K Urban fan
03-25-2005, 11:48 PM
Wow that is one of the best sets I have seen to date. It is really in good condition what a good buy!!!

Whirled One
05-30-2005, 06:09 PM
Update!

Yes, it's been a while! I sort of put this project on the back burner for a bit, but this weekend I jumped back into it. Ah, well, I figure this set had been sitting inactive for quite a while anyway before I got it, so a few more months won't hurt. :)

First off, got the horizontal oscillator problem fixed-- it was C602 which goes across the sine coil. It tested okay earlier, but I decided to replace it anyway, and that was it! Yayyyy! :banana:

I also decided to just go and re-cap most of the HV section, after C115 "blew" during a test run (this cap couples the 800V B+ boost line with the "horiz tuning" coil in the damper circuit). I'm one of those who tends to avoid blindly replacing caps, but I figure this will save some potential future headaches. ['Sides, if I had just gone and re-capped the horiz osc circuit in the first place, I wouldn't have had this problem for so long! Of course, at least now I know exactly what component was bad, and I learned something in the meantime, so I guess it's a trade off...]

Next I need to tackle the chroma section, which may be interesting, since I haven't had any experience with chroma issues. As you can see in some of the attached images, it was making color for a while [though the color phase or something was way off-- as you can also see, the colors are 'mixed-up', and there was no setting of the hue control that would fully correct them. Also, the fine tuning had to be mistuned (note the noise bands) to get any color]. Unfortunately, it suddenly seemed to "lose" the R-Y channel shortly thereafter. I poked around a bit, and repaired and re-dressed two wires that for some reason had long ago been wedged between the power resistors on the 'riser' card and the adjacent color amp tubes, which had caused the wires to char. However, after replacing the chassis and switching the set on, I find that now there's no chroma at all. :( I get a passable B&W image (though with poor purity and convergence, since I haven't done anything with that yet), but no color. Adjusting the color killer does not even bring in color 'noise', so there's definitely no color signal getting through.

Any ideas? BTW, one thing I noticed that I thought was odd-- the colorburst crystal in this set is mounted in a glass tube (like a 7-pin minature tube envelope) hidden under a metal shield. I wonder why they didn't use a regular metal-can-mounted crystal in these sets?

Another thing I need to do is clean the tuner. The station selector is *very* touchy at best, and some channel positions don't seem to work at all. I think I'm going to have to completely disassemble the tuner though-- I did try a little tuner cleaner spray in the openings near the switch wafers hoping I could just 'short-cut' this job, but this had little to no effect. Is there any particular "trick" to this?

Chad Hauris
06-02-2005, 08:17 AM
I have moved the portion of this thread dealing with the TV analyst and cap replacement to a new thread as it sort of diverged from the main topic here.