View Full Version : GE 800d Restoration


Jon F
01-12-2014, 11:11 PM
Hey all, I'm starting on my 2nd restoration, a nice example of a GE 800d. I bought this off craigslist locally, and luckily it was in good shape especially the bakelite cabinet.

See pictures attached. I have a cap kit on order, and I have some leftover diodes from my previous restoration I can use in this set also. However it looks like one of the selenium rectifiers has already been replaced with a diode in a past repair? Hm. Everything else, including a vast majority of the tubes appear original.

Anything else to look out for in the set? I read about it having a hot chassis what extra precautions should I take? Also, the electro coating on the CRT, what is the purpose? Is the entire surface charged?

Thanks!

Electronic M
01-13-2014, 01:49 AM
IIRC your only previous restoration was on an electrostaticly deflected set. With that in mind, there are some safety concerns on this to be mindful of. Hot chassis sets have one leg of the AC line connected to the chassis so if you touch the chassis and anything with a path to ground you are liable to get a nasty shock. You should look into getting a line isolation transformer to isolate the set from the direct DC path between the chassis and line that it has. Keep in mind that if you use any AC powered test equipment with the set while it is running without powering the set through an isolation transformer you may cause severe damage to your test equipment and or TV.

Next up is the HV system. Magnetic deflection sets tend to have much higher HV than electrostatic sets, and also tend to store that HV much longer. The coating on the outside of the CRT is grounded(or at least should be if nothing is wrong). That conductive coating along with the glass wall of the CRT and an internal coating form a capacitor. That capacitor integral to the CRT filters the HV, and also can store it for long after the set is powered off. Avoid working inside the HV cage or around the anode connector on the CRT bell when the set is on or the HV has not been manually discharged. Getting hit by HV, even stored charge from the CRT, is usually not fatal, but it can hurt pretty bad, and if it triggers your reflexes you can do a great deal of damage to your self and the set as your arm jerks back.

There are two ways to manually discharge CRTs: resistive discharge, and direct shorting. Resistive discharge is the better method and requires an HV probe (or some kind of homemade resistor probe) to bleed down the voltage over about a minutes time or less. Clip the ground of the probe to the chassis, and touch the tip to a bare HV contact and watch for the meeter to drop to 0.
The dead short method involves taking a WELL INSULATED screwdriver and using a jumper to connect the metal shaft to the chassis then touching the metal tip of the screw driver to a HV contact...If a loud POP is heard you had HV before the pop and have successfully discharged it. The downside to the short method is that after discharge the HV anode tends to 'recover' charge after a while and return to having HV on it(I'm not sure why though).

cwmoser
01-13-2014, 05:34 AM
Hi Jon, I restored a GE 805 - very similar to your GE 800 -- about 2 years ago.
It was a fun project and these old GE TVs are super performers with very
nice video.

I would recommend you remove that Selinum and old Diode and replace with
1N4007 rectifiers and a 5 ohm high wattage resistor in series.

Here is my restoration thread:
http://antiqueradios.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=189602

And, I recommend reviewing Tom Albrecht's notes about these TVs at:
http://www.radiomuseum.org/r/general_el_805ch_locomotiv.html
http://antiqueradios.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=190884

You can download Schematics (Riders TV4) here:
http://www.earlytelevision.org/tv_schematic_diagrams_postwar.html

Carl

Jon F
01-13-2014, 07:21 AM
Thanks guys, I've rebuilt a few arcade monitors in the past so I'm comfortable with discharging the CRT. I've been toying with buying a Sencore PR57 for a little while, I should probably pick one up.

Also thanks for the resources, definitely using 2 more of my 1N4007 diodes in this set.

rca2000
01-15-2014, 09:40 PM
As to why the CRT "recovers" it's charge after a bit....OFTEN enough to bite you once again...has to do with the "time constant"--of its "capacitive effect". IN all reality--the glass envelope of a magnetic deflected CRT becomes a capacitor---and like any cap---there is a "time constant " that determines how fast its charge can drain off. It therefore takes a number of "hits" to drain the charge off completely. Others here may be able to explain this better than I can, but I HAVE been bitten by an anode after discharging it a NUMBER Of times. SO, be careful.

bandersen
01-15-2014, 10:46 PM
From Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric_absorption

Dielectric absorption is the name given to the effect by which a capacitor that has been charged for a long time discharges only incompletely when briefly discharged. Although an ideal capacitor would remain at zero volts after being discharged, real capacitors will develop a small voltage coming from time-delayed dipole discharging, a phenomenon that is also called dielectric relaxation, "soakage" or "battery action".

cwmoser
01-16-2014, 07:54 AM
Bob, that is something I have wondered about.
Thanks for the explaination behind it.

Carl

Electronic M
01-16-2014, 03:47 PM
Bob, that is something I have wondered about.
Thanks for the explaination behind it.

Carl

Ditto, it seemed strange/impossible for it to be able to regain voltage after being discharged to 0V without that explanation. I've found resistive discharge prevents it from bouncing back.

Jon F
02-01-2014, 07:16 PM
Update on the set:

-3/4 of the way through the recap job, i still have 9 paper caps and 1 small ecap to go.
-Replaced the selenium rectifier and old diode with 1N4007 and 20ohm resistors.
-Replaced the HV lead to the CRT with a modern one.
-Replaced globar resistors. Old ones tested at 900 and 1300 ohms. Spec is 75 ohms!!
-Readjusted the ion trap and all basic controls.

Some progress as you can see from the picture. Not enough vertical size and horizontal is way too wide. Neither it adjustable better than that. Sound is good.

The speaker cone is damaged, is it a standard replacement or do I need to send it out for rebuild?

Phil Nelson
02-01-2014, 07:53 PM
I have patched many tears and small holes in speakers with tea bag paper and flexible glue. You can also buy GC Service Cement, but I don't know whether it's really worth buying a special-purpose glue.

TVs have relatively low-fi audio (small speaker, rudimentary circuitry), so a nicely patched speaker will sound no worse than a new one. If the old cone is completely ruined, then of course you'll need to recone or get a new speaker.

That picture looks promising. If you have already finished a basic recap of the vertical and horizontal circuits, I would look next at mica caps (if there are any) and resistors there.

Phil Nelson
Phil's Old Radios
http://antiqueradio.org/index.html

Jon F
02-10-2014, 09:51 PM
Finished replacing all of the paper and electrolytic caps. Horizontal width is now good but vertical height, while improved, is still too low.

Any tubes that could cause this or should I start hunting down out of spec resistors? How do I test Mica caps/ what do I need to buy to do so?

Thanks!

Jon F
02-22-2014, 01:56 PM
I found the culprit, R296 was twice its nominal value of 4.3Mohm. Replacing this resistor brought the height back to normal.

After the TV warms up the picture stabilizes mostly, but it is still a little twitchy.

Everything was working OK last night, then today I powered up the set and after a few minutes adjusted the vert hold and POOF, the CRT went blank. No bad sound or smoke, and everything else still worked.

Any ideas?

Electronic M
02-22-2014, 03:18 PM
It is either loss of HV or a CRT bias issue. Check the HV first. It is easier to check and more common to fail.

Jon F
02-22-2014, 03:39 PM
I found the rear horz hold control is broken and was intermittent grounding to the chassis. Mainly because I tried to adjust it and spun it around so part of it was grounding.

Can I bypass this control? There already is a horz hold on the front of the TV.

Jon F
02-22-2014, 08:38 PM
Also have a horz linearity issue that may or may not be related:

Phil Nelson
02-22-2014, 10:09 PM
I believe the rear horizontal hold control is basically a coarse frequency adjuster and the front one is a fine adjuster. If both are working, you would set the rear one so that you have good horizontal stability with the front control set at the center of its travel. After that, minor adjustments can be made with the front control alone. In other words, the rear (coarse) control gets you in the right ballpark, and you make everyday adjustments with the front control. Your service manual should explain all of that, or at least give brief instructions for setting these controls.

If the rear control is a potentiometer, the simple repair is to replace it with one of the same value. While you're waiting for the new pot to arrive in the mail, I suppose you could experiment with substituting a fixed resistor for that control -- trying different likely values until you find one that gives you a stable picture. That's not a good long-term solution (there is a reason why the designers used a pot there instead of a fixed resistor), but at least you could watch the TV in the meantime.

If the rear control is an adjustable coil, maybe not so easy to find a sub. Moyer is sometimes able to supply vintage TV parts:

http://www.moyerelectronics.com/Departments/Products/Vintage-TV-Parts.aspx

Just my $0.02.

Phil Nelson
Phil's Old Radios
http://antiqueradio.org/index.html

Jon F
02-22-2014, 10:17 PM
Thanks Phil, it is an adjustable coil-

Jon F
04-13-2014, 10:03 PM
I took another look at this project today. I wrote down all of the values of the micamold style caps to order replacements. These are all very small value, most around 100pf.

The issue I can't figure out is a severe linearity distortion on the left hand side of the screen. See attached. There is even a brightness variance on this band of distortion. All paper and electro caps have been replaced. All I can think to do next is replace the micamold caps.

The horizontal linearity control works, but it does not change the distortion at all.

Tom Albrecht
04-13-2014, 11:10 PM
These sets have a lot of domino-style caps in the sweep and sync sections. I was just working on one today, and it had jumpy sync, so I bit the bullet and just replaced all the mica and mica-like caps in the board near the sweep circuitry (I left the micas in the RF and IF sections, which I generally find don't need attention nearly as often). This solved my problem completely. You may simply want to do the same thing in your set, at least for all the mica caps directly involved in the horizontal sweep. There are probably something like 8 of them in that circuitry. Overall, I replaced something like 17 (!) mica and mica-like caps today in the entire sweep and sync sections.

Note that not all of the mica-like caps in the sweep section are low pF. I replaced a number in the 1000 pF, 3900 pF, and 6800 pF range as well (these are the larger rectangular caps).

EdKozk2
04-13-2014, 11:17 PM
Jon, You may want to check / replace c235 a 47mmf cap in the horizontal deflection circuit/yoke.

Jon F
04-13-2014, 11:31 PM
Thanks guys, looks like that's what I will do.

I must be reading these cap values wrong as I found nothing anywhere near that high in capacitance. I got ahold of the photofact hoping that would help to ID the values, only to find the chassis in the pictures has different components all over the place.

Tom Albrecht
04-13-2014, 11:59 PM
Check the big letter stamped on the front of your chassis. The various Rider schematics for the 800 series can be found here: http://www.earlytelevision.org/tv_schematic_diagrams_postwar.html . There are quite a few variants, but perhaps you'll be able to find a schematic that matches your set pretty well. Mine is stamped "W" which matches the Sams schematic pretty well.

EdKozk2
04-14-2014, 12:10 AM
The Wallace Teleaides I have covers models 800a through 800d using two schematics.

Jon F
04-14-2014, 08:36 PM
Instead of going off the color codes on the capacitors and going by the schematic I have a list of approx 14 or so caps to replace in the horizontal sweep area, and the values seem much more reasonable.

Hopefully get back to this one by the weekend or early next week when the caps come in.

Jon F
06-18-2014, 11:40 AM
Late update, but I finally got around to replacing all the mica caps in the horizontal section. No change to the set's behavior. The stretching on the left hand side is still the same. Also the H and V are relatively unstable even with a very strong signal.

Any other ideas where I can look? All tubes are good, all paper, electrolytic, and horz mica caps have been replaced.

Is this a grounding issue? What about the mica cap on the yoke?

bandersen
06-19-2014, 12:18 AM
Have you tried adjusting the horizontal drive level ?

Jon F
06-22-2014, 08:11 PM
Thanks, horizontal drive has not affect on the issue. I also replaced the capacitor on the yoke also no affect.

Jon F
06-22-2014, 09:53 PM
The ryder's says both the horz size and horz linearity coils should be 29.3 ohm. The horz size measures 28.5 ohm but the linearity measures 6 ohm.

Could this be the issue?

bandersen
06-22-2014, 10:56 PM
Could be if there's a shorted turn. It's rather odd the the drive control has no effect. It should have a very noticeable effect in the linearity and brightness as it controls how much signal gets to the horizontal output tube.

Jon F
07-10-2014, 11:28 PM
Got the coil from Moyers for $10:thmbsp:, but unfortunately it wasn't the issue, the old coil ended up testing good out of circuit, but bad in circuit. I tried the new coil anyway but TV has the same issue.:thumbsdn:

Jon F
07-15-2014, 06:19 PM
Figured it out, a "bad" 25W4 Horizontal Sweep Damper. On a hunch I bought a NOS 25W4 to replace, and the problem went away.

To make sure I didn't miss anything I tested the original 25W4 again and while it tested good with no leakage or shorts, it was indeed causing the issue.

Sync is still a little touchy but image is much better.

bandersen
07-15-2014, 08:31 PM
:thmbsp: I think dampers see some pretty big voltages that a tube tester just isn't going to be able to simulate. I've seen the same issue with horizontal output tubes - test fine in several testers but don't work right in the set.