View Full Version : Tube tester for a Predicta 21EAP4


rickfray
02-21-2013, 09:31 PM
I have a Predicta Holiday I'm starting to restore with a 21EAP4 tube. I wanted to test the tube to see if it was any good before attempting an electronic overhaul. I got a B&K 465 CRT tester off ebay but didn't realize until I got it that it didn't have any adapters except the color one with the molex connector. The schematic with the B&K shows an "A" adapter that I suppose corresponds to the tube setup chart for 21EAP4 which says use adpater "A". The problem is, the schematic just shows a standard round 8 pin socket symbol with 6 of the pins wired but the tube connector is an oddball 5 pin with 5 wires (2 up, 1 in the middle, 2 down-slightly wider than the top 2) so I can't confirm that is actually the right adapter. I've seen some other 465's on ebay with inconclusive pictures of adapters to assure me the they will work with an EAP4.

Has anyone actually tested a 21EAP4 with a B&K 465 and can confirm what adpater I need, or how to build one? I do have the color adapter that connects to the universal B&K plug/cable that has the molex connector on the end, so I'm guessing if I can confirm the correct tube pinout to use, I could get a molex and make at least a jumper cable adapter.

Also I'd appreciate a copy of a tube manual page for the 21EAP4 if anyone can scan it. I have a few tube manuals but not for the 21EAP4. Many thanks as I start on my Holiday fixer upper.

Rick

Eric H
02-21-2013, 09:56 PM
Hi Rick, welcome to VK.

The 465 should be able to test that tube, with the color adapter removed the socket on the 465 will fit the older B&W tubes like the 10BP4 so you could use the diagram of that tube to figure out the pinout of the tester and apply it to the Predicta tube.

I know the 465 uses a specific Cutoff voltage for different tubes, I have a 466 and the settings for 95% of the B&W tubes are the same but it does not work the same way as the 465, it also has an A & B socket, possibly the same adapter as used by the 465.
Someone here is bound to have a 465 and will be able to tell you what settings to use.

I would caution that tube has an odd heater voltage of 2.35 volts so if you do get it hooked up be sure the voltage is set right first.

Collectively our experiences here with the original Predicta tubes is that they are more often bad than not, hopefully yours will be the exception.

marty59
02-22-2013, 08:21 AM
Here's tube data for you courtesy of Bunker of Doom

http://www.bunkerofdoom.com/tubes/syl59/HTMLS/CRT.HTM

rickfray
02-22-2013, 07:09 PM
Many thanks for the tube data marty59!

Rick

rickfray
02-22-2013, 07:13 PM
Eric, It's not the settings I'm worried about, it's whether I can find the right adapter. The socket connected to the 465 via the cable has 12 pins, but the 21EAP4 only has 5 pins on a 5/8" round plug and they aren't in a circle like most of the adapters I've seen. If I could see a picture of the "A" socket holes, I'd know for certain if that's the one.

As an alternative option, what CRT testers have Predicta restorers used to test a 21EAP4? Thanks

Rick

marty59
02-22-2013, 09:15 PM
Eric, It's not the settings I'm worried about, it's whether I can find the right adapter. The socket connected to the 465 via the cable has 12 pins, but the 21EAP4 only has 5 pins on a 5/8" round plug and they aren't in a circle like most of the adapters I've seen. If I could see a picture of the "A" socket holes, I'd know for certain if that's the one.

As an alternative option, what CRT testers have Predicta restorers used to test a 21EAP4? Thanks

Rick

You can "test" with just about any tester, rejuvinating opinions/options will vary and that Predicta tube is delicate.

Like tube testers, you can't have just one!

Eric H
02-23-2013, 12:29 AM
Here are some pictures of the A & B sockets from my 466, it's probably the same as the one for the 465 since the 12 pin socket is the same, I don't remember which one is used for the 21EAP4 off hand but I can look it up.

Even though there are 12 pins in the tester socket I believe only 5 of them are used, 2 for the heater, G1, G2, and Cathode (K).

In any case I wouldn't rejuvenate a Predicta CRT (or much else) with a 465 or a 466, they are just brute force blasting, probably a 470 is the earliest B&K with a decent rejuvenation system.
They are fine for testing though.

radiotvnut
02-23-2013, 12:46 AM
I agree about the 465. 20+ years ago, my first CRT tester was a 465 that was given to me by a repair shop who no longer used it. It was fine for testing; but, wasn't as fine for rejuvenating. I was able to bring quite a few standard B&W tubes back to life by popping them on the lowest setting (which, is still harsh); but, I also blew up quite a few tubes in an attempt to rejuvenate them. Within a few years, I bought a B&K 470 and I don't recall ever smoking a tube with it's rejuvenate function. I've had some CRT's that were simply too worn out to rejuvenate; but, I don't recall one ever being ruined.

Once, I loaned my 465 to someone who wanted to rejuvenate a color tube. Despite my warning, he thought that starting out on the highest setting would do the best good. Well, it did the best good at ruining his tube. Those models have three levels of rejuvenation for a reason and one is supposed to try the lowest setting first. If that works, don't go any further.

The B&K 467 and later model numbered units have safe rejuvenate functions, as does the Sencore CR70 and newer units.

When I rejuvenate a tube with my 470, I always start with the "clean and balance" function. This is a lower level of rejuvenation and is often all that's needed to bring a tube back.

kx250rider
02-23-2013, 12:04 PM
I think there are a couple of wires swapped for the Predicta tubes, to prevent the filaments from coming on if somebody puts a 2.7 volt tube in a 6.3 volt TV, or from installing a 6.3 volt tube in a Predicta. If you don't have the right socket, you can check the schematics of the Predicta and any other TV with that size socket but standard filaments, and temporarily swap the wires.

Charles

Eric H
02-23-2013, 12:52 PM
I think there are a couple of wires swapped for the Predicta tubes, to prevent the filaments from coming on if somebody puts a 2.7 volt tube in a 6.3 volt TV, or from installing a 6.3 volt tube in a Predicta. If you don't have the right socket, you can check the schematics of the Predicta and any other TV with that size socket but standard filaments, and temporarily swap the wires.

Charles

There's a difference but it's not the heaters, I think they swapped G1 and K or similar. Using the wrong socket just results in the meter pegging.

rickfray
02-23-2013, 09:32 PM
Thanks for the pictures Eric, but the brightness makes it hard to tell. The BK 465 setup guide sais the 21EAP4 should use the "A" socket, but the your "socka" pic doesn't look like the plug. There needs to be a pin hole in the middle of 4 other pins. The schematic for adapter "A" shows an 8 pin socket but only 6 holes are wired up so that's confusing also. I'm adding pictures below of the actual tube connector and jack on the circuit board. The plug is about 5/8" in diameter.

http://videokarma.org/picture.php?albumid=615&pictureid=3350
http://videokarma.org/picture.php?albumid=615&pictureid=3352

bandersen
02-23-2013, 10:34 PM
You tester plugs right into the CRT base not that cable.

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3623/3353084024_a98906376b_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/70039806@N00/3353084024/)

Eric H
02-24-2013, 02:01 AM
Bobs correct, you plug the adapter directly onto the base of the CRT, after removing the connector that's plugged onto it.

The plug you show is just the plug in cable they used so the head could be removed from the body of the set.

charokeeroad
02-24-2013, 10:50 AM
I may be able to help. I've tested several 21" Predicta tubes in the last few weeks with a B&K 465. It will take me an hour or so to put all the pieces together but I think it will give you the info your looking for. I'll post pieces at a time so here goes. First, two pictures of the adapter. The heater pins on the adapter are marked on the adapter as 1 and 2 but I think it's better described as the sockets on each side of the key. These pins are the same for the 2.3V CRT and the 6V CRT. My set up data doesn't call out any differences in the wiring between the 6V and the 2.3volt.

On my adapter you can see that I cut into the black lead which is one of the heater leads and added some wire and some clips. I use these clips to do a current measurement as I'm testing the CRT.

charokeeroad
02-24-2013, 11:03 AM
Here is a copy of an email from Tom Albrecht who helped me resolve the 2.3v CRT vs the 6v CRT delema. Often it's not possible to tell the difference between the two even when the CRTs are marked with one or the other designations. Only a current test can tell them apart. I found a few sets clearly marked with "21SFA" inside the plastic housing which is not a correct description of any CRT the closest is SF21A which is a 6.3v CRT. After testing the current in these CRT they were found to be good 6v CRTs.

"From: Tom and Catherine Albrecht
To: Cherokeeroad
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: 21SFA

John,

I studied the schematic and confirmed that the original SF-21A CRT has a 600 mA filament current (same as all standard 6 volt CRTs). That would seem to suggest that both of the tubes you are looking at are 6 volt tubes. At some point if you disassemble the plastic CRT housing, I bet you'll find a number on the tube for a standard 6 volt tube.

If you find a CRT that draws 600 mA at 2.34 volts, then that is an original CRT with 2.34 V filament. At 6 volts it would draw substantially more. A 6 volt tube will draw less than 600 mA at 2.34 volts.
By the way, while they are warming up, they draw quite a bit more. They settle into their nominal value once the filament is hot.

Tom"

Hope this helps.

rickfray
02-24-2013, 09:46 PM
Thanks, I'll have to find out where to turn in my EE degrees for not thinking about that. I disconnected the other end so I could remove the chassis. The only markings on the tube is a label that says 21EAP4. Is it still inconclusive whether it's 2.34 or 6 volts until I do the current test?

rickfray
02-24-2013, 09:53 PM
Thanks John, the process you're documenting will be helpful. On your adapter mod, did you just splice the yellow alligator clip cables in to the 2 heater cables or did you replace them? I'm guessing it was splicing so you could still run the CRT tests.

N2IXK
02-24-2013, 09:56 PM
The 21EAP4 is a 2.3V tube. If the tube was 6.3V, it would have a different type number.

charokeeroad
02-24-2013, 11:53 PM
Thanks, I'll have to find out where to turn in my EE degrees for not thinking about that. I disconnected the other end so I could remove the chassis. The only markings on the tube is a label that says 21EAP4. Is it still inconclusive whether it's 2.34 or 6 volts until I do the current test?

In my humble opinion you will not know conclusively until you do a current test. I have seen tubes marked 21EAP4 that turned out to be 6.3V tubes. It's a great feeling when you discover one of these 6.3v tubes that are incorrectly marked because it almost certainly means that someone else passed it up thinking it was dead.

charokeeroad
02-24-2013, 11:57 PM
Thanks John, the process you're documenting will be helpful. On your adapter mod, did you just splice the yellow alligator clip cables in to the 2 heater cables or did you replace them? I'm guessing it was splicing so you could still run the CRT tests.

Right, I just cut one of the heater leads and extended each end and attached clips, using the clips to attach the meter leads. That way when I'm done with the current test I can just clip the two ends together. There's probably a better way to do it but this way works for me.

charokeeroad
02-25-2013, 12:03 AM
The 21EAP4 is a 2.3V tube. If the tube was 6.3V, it would have a different type number.


That statement should be true but it's not. I think just through lazyness when the CRTs were rebuilt the markings weren't updated. I've seen that condition on the last three CRT in a row that I tested. Two of the last three CRTs were marked "21SFA" inside... There is no such tube. The current test proved this CRT to be a very good 6.3V tube.

Eric H
02-25-2013, 12:29 AM
That statement should be true bit it's not. I think just through lazyness when the CRTs were rebuilt the markings weren't updated. I've seen that condition on the last three CRT in a row that I tested. Two of the last three CRTs were marked "21SFA" inside... There is no such tube. The current test proved this CRT to be a very good 6.3V tube.

I don't think 21SFA is a valid number, it probably just means a 21" Short Focus Aperture. 21EAP4 is the original 21" Predicta CRT number. I would go by whatever number is glued to the CRT, not the housing.

The last two Predictas I got had 6.3 volt tubes, I found it out through simple trial and error, if it won't light at 2.3 then go up slowly to 6.3 and see if it does, just don't start at 6.3. They also had stickers saying they had been converted to the 6 volt tube but I wasn't taking any chances.

I also question is 2.35 is the correct voltage? I also see some information that says they are 2.68 volts and my B&K has a 2.68 volt mark on the meter but not a 2.35?

bandersen
02-25-2013, 12:39 AM
Yes, 2.35 is correct for the 21EAP4. 2.68 for the 17DAP4.

charokeeroad
02-25-2013, 12:49 AM
I don't think 21SFA is a valid number, it probably just means a 21" Short Focus Aperture. 21EAP4 is the original 21" Predicta CRT number. I would go by whatever number is glued to the CRT, not the housing.

The last two Predictas I got had 6.3 volt tubes, I found it out through simple trial and error, if it won't light at 2.3 then go up slowly to 6.3 and see if it does, just don't start at 6.3. They also had stickers saying they had been converted to the 6 volt tube but I wasn't taking any chances.

I also question is 2.35 is the correct voltage? I also see some information that says they are 2.68 volts and my B&K has a 2.68 volt mark on the meter but not a 2.35?

The problem with testing that way is that the filaments on those tubes are fairly robust. One could run a 2.3v filament at 6.3V for several hours before it would burn out. One could walk way and think they had a 6.3v CRT because it held up for a few minutes at that voltage only to put it in a set and have it burn out or never work at all. The Current test is fast and definative. I haven't found one Predicta CRT that was marked with the correct voltage. I'm sure they're out there but I haven't found one, Most of the time I can't find any markings on the CRT at all. I usually get some glow on a 6.3v CRT at the 2.3V setting.

charokeeroad
02-25-2013, 01:01 AM
That's a good one Eric, 21SFA, "Short Focus Aperture". I thought it was a typo and was intending to say SF21A which it the only 6.3v CRT replacement that my tester shows.

CORRECTION SF21A is 2.3v CRT

rickfray
02-25-2013, 08:14 PM
Thanks everyone. I understand the tube connection now and have the correct adapters on order. Hopefully by next weekend I will be able to determine the exact type and state of the Holiday tube.

charokeeroad
02-27-2013, 11:11 AM
Keep at it and post some pictures of the set up you use and some screen shots of the meter. Good Luck.

rickfray
03-02-2013, 01:51 PM
OK, I finally got the adapter to test my 21EAP4 with my B&K 465 CRT tester and here are the results: I set it up assuming a 2.34v filament.
No shorts
Emissions = 700/9.2 (not sure which scale I was supposed to be looking at)
Cutoff = 30 ( setup chart says 28 to 72)
Life test: meter went slowly down from 700 to 0 in about 7 seconds. With no experience, what does this tell me? It did hesitate briefly before decaying. Is that a good lifespan left?
The only thing I was not able to do right now was the current test to verify if it is drawing 600 mA at 2.35v as my handheld meter was only rated to 200mA. I have the adapter partially rewired as suggested above, awaiting an order of alligator clips. I there another technique for checking the current?

So based on that, does it look like I have a good tube? Thanks

charokeeroad
03-03-2013, 12:56 PM
If you read 700 on emissions with the heater voltage set at 2.3Volts I would say you have a good CRT. I wouldn't put the heater voltage any highter than that. If it was a 6.3 Volt CRT you wouldn't get any emissions at 2.3 volts. You could follow up with the amp test just to confirm but if your getting 700 emissions at 2.3 volts you've probably have a very good CRT.

rickfray
03-04-2013, 12:00 PM
Awesome. I couldn't do the current test because my multimeter is limited to 200ma and am not sure now whether it was AC or DC, so I ordered a cheapy one that does ACA & DCA up to 10A. But with the good emissions results and all, I will start the restor in earnest. While doing the initial cleaning of the main board while still in the chassis I already found one or 2 components with brokem leads and another tube that was missing (under a metal shield). It's one on the side of the tuner so it doesn't show up in the chassis layout diagram, so I'll have to do a process of elimination with the others already identfied to see what's missing. I'll post a picture of the 21EAP4 emissions reading when I have completed the current test.

El Predicta
03-05-2013, 09:22 AM
I've tested/rejuvenated scores of Predicta tubes. Those can be delicate. I would never use anything but a Beltron on a Predicta CRT .

Tom Albrecht
03-07-2013, 11:52 AM
I'm working on a 17" Predicta right now. The customer mentioned that the CRT was known to be weak, so I tested it when it arrived and found it to be nearly dead in terms of emission. Increasing the filament voltage to about 4 volts brought the emission up into the good range, and I wondered whether it might be a 6 volt replacement tube. However, visual inspection confirmed it was an original 17DRP4 with a 2.68 volt filament. I gave it a shot of "auto restore" on my CR-70, but the emission didn't improve much.

Testing in the set, however, surprised me. A nice bright picture! This set had been "minimally restored" (just replace a few problematic components) by a previous tech, so I started working on the full recap, etc. After a few days of minimal usage of the CRT, I noticed it went suddenly quite dark, and now looks like the weak CRT it always appeared to be on the tester.

After further investigation, I found that the previous tech had moved the filament wire for the CRT from the 2.68 volt tap on the transformer filament winding to the 6 volt tap. That's why the tube looked so good for a short while! The filament didn't burn out even after a few hours, but the cathode emission did not hold up over time.

Now I know this CRT is really dead.

By the way, the CRT filament did not look unusually bright at 6 volts. These Predicta CRT filaments have a rather dim glow at their proper voltage. Don't be fooled by that into thinking you have a 6 volt tube when you actually have a 2 volt tube.

rickfray
03-11-2013, 10:49 AM
I got my current meter and completed the current test on the 21EAP4 and as suspected from the previous CRT tests with the heater set to 2.3v, the current tracks to the range of 2.3v tube - 520mA. Attached are picture of the meter and CRT tests.
http://videokarma.org/picture.php?pictureid=3359&albumid=615&dl=1363016515&thumb=1
http://videokarma.org/picture.php?pictureid=3357&albumid=615&dl=1363016515&thumb=1
http://videokarma.org/picture.php?pictureid=3358&albumid=615&dl=1363016515&thumb=1

Rick

charokeeroad
03-17-2013, 08:34 PM
I couldn't get the pictures but it looks like from the info you've gathered that you've got a 2.3V CRT and a good one at that. Try the "go advanced" button to download your pics, then "manage attachments".

rickfray
03-18-2013, 11:51 AM
I couldn't get the pictures but it looks like from the info you've gathered that you've got a 2.3V CRT and a good one at that. Try the "go advanced" button to download your pics, then "manage attachments".

Yes, that's what I believe. Let's see if I get the pix displayed right this time.

current reading with filament set to 2.3V
http://videokarma.org/picture.php?albumid=616&pictureid=3359
emissions test
http://videokarma.org/picture.php?albumid=616&pictureid=3357
cutoff test - setup chart said 28-72 and it's right on 30.
http://videokarma.org/picture.php?albumid=616&pictureid=3358